The DOI matches its Crossref record.
DNA unwinding produced by site-specific intrastrand crosslinks of the antitumor drug cis-diamminedichloroplatinum(II)
Abstract
The DNA unwinding produced by specific adducts of the antitumor drug cis-diamminedichloroplatinum(II) has been quantitatively determined. Synthetic DNA duplex oligonucleotides of varying lengths with two base pair cohesive ends were synthesized and characterized that contained site-specific intrastrand N7-purine/N7-purine cross-links. Included are cis-[Pt(NH3)2[d(GpG)]], cis-[Pt(NH3)2(d(ApG)]], and cis-[Pt(NH3)2[d(GpTpG)]] adducts, respectively referred to as cis-GG, cis-AG, and cis-GTG. Local DNA distortions at the site of platination were amplified by polymerization of these monomers and quantitatively evaluated by using polyacrylamide gel electrophoresis. The extent of DNA unwinding was determined by systematically varying the interplatinum distance, or phasing, in polymers containing the adducts. The multimer that migrates most slowly gives the optimal phasing for cooperative bending, from which the degree of unwinding can be obtained. We find that the cis-GG and cis-AG adducts both unwind DNA by 13 degrees, while the cis-GTG adduct unwinds DNA by 23 degrees. In addition, experiments are presented that support previous studies revealing that a hinge joint forms at the sites of platination in DNA molecules containing trans-GTG adducts. On the basis of an analysis of the present and other published studies of site-specifically modified DNA, we propose that local duplex unwinding is a major determinant in the recognition of DNA damage by the Escherichia coli (A)BC excinuclease. In addition, local duplex unwinding of 13 degrees and bending by 35 degrees are shown to correlate well with the recognition of platinated DNA by a previously identified damage recognition protein (DRP) in human cells.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Cisplatin: mode of cytotoxic action and molecular basis of resistance
Siddik, Z. H. (2003) · Oncogene · doi:10.1038/sj.onc.1206933 · Cited by 3,335
Molecular mechanisms of cisplatin resistance
Galluzzi, L., Senovilla, L., Vitale, I., Michels, J., Martins, I., Kepp, O., Castedo, M., & Kroemer, G. (2012) · Oncogene · doi:10.1038/onc.2011.384 · Cited by 2,760
Systems biology of cisplatin resistance: past, present and future
Galluzzi, L., Vitale, I., Michels, J., Brenner, C., Szabadkai, G., Harel-Bellan, A., Castedo, M., & Kroemer, G. (2014) · Cell Death & Disease · doi:10.1038/cddis.2013.428 · Cited by 782
Takahara, P. M., Rosenzweig, A. C., Frederick, C. A., & Lippard, S. J. (1995) · Nature · doi:10.1038/377649a0 · Cited by 769
Self-citationMolecular Mechanisms of Mammalian Global Genome Nucleotide Excision Repair
Gillet, L. C. J., & Schärer, O. D. (2006) · Chemical Reviews · doi:10.1021/cr040483f · Cited by 642
Metadata
- Authors
- Bellon, S. F., Coleman, J. H., & Lippard, S. J.
- Venue
- Biochemistry
- Publisher
- American Chemical Society (ACS)
- Published
- 1991-08-13
- Volume
- 30
- Issue
- 32
- Pages
- 8026-8035
- ISSN
- 0006-2960 (ISSN-L)
- 1520-4995
- OpenAlex
- W2062130291
- Cited by
- 291
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 6.61
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: DNA unwinding produced by site-specific intrastrand crosslinks of the antitumor drug cis-diamminedichloroplatinum(II). https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1021/bi00246a021
- The paper
- Bellon, S. F., Coleman, J. H., & Lippard, S. J. (1991). DNA unwinding produced by site-specific intrastrand crosslinks of the antitumor drug cis-diamminedichloroplatinum(II). Biochemistry. https://doi.org/10.1021/bi00246a021
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.