Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 265

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 2 of the 2 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Copper and Zinc Binding Modulates the Aggregation and Neurotoxic Properties of the Prion Peptide PrP106−126

Open access
Jobling, Michael F., Huang, Xudong, Stewart, Leanne R., Barnham, Kevin J., Curtain, Cyril, Volitakis, Irene, Perugini, Matthew, White, Anthony R., Cherny, Robert A., Masters, Colin L., Barrow, Colin J., Collins, Steven J., Bush, Ashley I., Cappai, Roberto·2001·Biochemistry

Abstract

The abnormal form of the prion protein (PrP) is believed to be responsible for the transmissible spongiform encephalopathies. A peptide encompassing residues 106-126 of human PrP (PrP106-126) is neurotoxic in vitro due its adoption of an amyloidogenic fibril structure. The Alzheimer's disease amyloid beta peptide (Abeta) also undergoes fibrillogenesis to become neurotoxic. Abeta aggregation and toxicity is highly sensitive to copper, zinc, or iron ions. We show that PrP106-126 aggregation, as assessed by turbidometry, is abolished in Chelex-100-treated buffer. ICP-MS analysis showed that the Chelex-100 treatment had reduced Cu(2+) and Zn(2+) levels approximately 3-fold. Restoring Cu(2+) and Zn(2+) to their original levels restored aggregation. Circular dichroism showed that the Chelex-100 treatment reduced the aggregated beta-sheet content of the peptide. Electron paramagnetic resonance spectroscopy identified a 2N1S1O coordination to the Cu(2+) atom, suggesting histidine 111 and methionine 109 or 112 are involved. Nuclear magnetic resonance confirmed Cu(2+) and Zn(2+) binding to His-111 and weaker binding to Met-112. An N-terminally acetylated PrP106-126 peptide did not bind Cu(2+), implicating the free amino group in metal binding. Mutagenesis of either His-111, Met-109, or Met-112 abolished PrP106-126 neurotoxicity and its ability to form fibrils. Therefore, Cu(2+) and/or Zn(2+) binding is critical for PrP106-126 aggregation and neurotoxicity.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1021/bi0029088

Cites

2 of 2 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Cited by

See all 265

Metadata

Authors
Jobling, M. F., Huang, X., Stewart, L. R., Barnham, K. J., Curtain, C., Volitakis, I., Perugini, M., White, A. R., Cherny, R. A., Masters, C. L., Barrow, C. J., Collins, S. J., Bush, A. I., & Cappai, R.
Venue
Biochemistry
Published
2001-06-16
Volume
40
Issue
27
Pages
8073-8084
ISSN
  • 0006-2960 (ISSN-L)
  • 1520-4995
OpenAlex
W2051564837
Cited by
265
References
2
FWCI
6.84
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
green

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.