Cited by 110Nicotinic Acetylcholine Receptors StudyReceptor Mechanisms and SignalingIon channel regulation and function

Rapid kinetics of agonist binding and permeability response analyzed in parallel on acetylcholine receptor rich membranes from Torpedo marmorata

Open access
Heidmann, Thierry, Bernhardt, Julius, Neumann, Eberhard, Changeux, Jean Pierre·1983·Biochemistry

Abstract

Excitable acetylcholine receptor rich membrane fragments from Torpedo marmorata have been used to measure, in parallel, (1) the permeability response to the fluorescent cholinergic agonist Dns-C6-Cho (in the 0.1 microM to millimolar concentration range) characterized by both the initial rate of Li+ transport and the rate of channel closure using the rapid-mixing quench-flow technique and (2) the kinetics of interaction of Dns-C6-Cho with the acetylcholine receptor sites using the rapid-mixing stopped-flow technique. Analysis of the kinetics of Dns-C6-Cho binding in the millisecond to minute time scale leads to the identification of at least three conformational states of the acetylcholine receptor: a "low-affinity" one (approximately 50 microM) that can be interconverted in the fraction of a second to a transient state of "intermediate affinity" (approximately 1 microM), followed by the final stabilization, in the second to minute time range, of a state of "high affinity" (approximately 3 nM). Comparison of Dns-C6-Cho binding data with the permeability response to the same agonist demonstrates that the binding to the low-affinity conformation(s) of the acetylcholine receptor sites coincides with the triggering of the permeability increase--or "activation"--and the transitions to the intermediate- and high-affinity states with the two-step process of channel closing--or "desensitization". The data are interpreted in terms of a minimum four-state "allosteric" model for the acet…

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1021/bi00292a029

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Authors
Heidmann, T., Bernhardt, J., Neumann, E., & Changeux, J. P.
Affiliations
Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique (FR)
Venue
Biochemistry
Published
1983-11-08
Volume
22
Issue
23
Pages
5452-5459
ISSN
  • 0006-2960 (ISSN-L)
  • 1520-4995
OpenAlex
W2043557877
Cited by
110
References
0
Citations by year
2025: 1 · 2024: 2 · 2023: 1 · 2021: 2 · 2019: 1 · 2018: 1 · 2014: 5 · 2013: 3 · 2012: 2
FWCI
2.70
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Licence
other-oa
Locations
  • Biochemistry (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • PUB – Publications at Bielefeld University (Bielefeld University) (submittedVersion, other-oa)
  • Publikationen an der Universität Bielefeld (Universität Bielefeld) (submittedVersion, other-oa)
Funders
  • Muscular Dystrophy Association
  • Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft
  • Institut National de la Santé et de la Recherche Médicale
  • Fondation de France
  • Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Nicotinic Acetylcholine Receptors Study
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Receptor Mechanisms and Signaling
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Ion channel regulation and function
Keywords
acetylcholine receptor, Torpedo marmorata, ion channel permeability, channel desensitization, channel closure, receptor conformational states, allosteric model, four-state model, low-affinity binding, high-affinity state, stopped flow
MeSH terms
Quaternary Ammonium Compounds, Animals, Cell Membrane Permeability, Dansyl Compounds, Kinetics, Mathematics, Receptors, Cholinergic, Torpedo

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review