The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Contributions of the large hydrophobic amino acids to the stability of staphylococcal nuclease
Abstract
To quantitate the contributions of the large hydrophobic residues in staphylococcal nuclease to the stability of its native state, single alanine and glycine substitutions were constructed by site-directed mutagenesis for each of the 11 leucine, 9 valine, 7 tyrosine, 5 isoleucine, 4 methionine, and 3 phenylalanine residues. In addition, each isoleucine was also mutated to valine. The resulting collection of 83 mutant nucleases was submitted to guanidine hydrochloride denaturation using intrinsic tryptophan fluorescence to monitor the equilibrium constant between the native and denatured states. From analysis of these data, each mutant protein's stability to reversible denaturation (delta GH2O) and sensitivity to guanidine hydrochloride (mGuHCl or d(delta G)/d[GuHCl]) were obtained. Four unexpected trends were observed. (1) A striking bipartite distribution was found for sites of mutations that altered mGuHCl: mutations that increased this parameter only involved residues that contribute side chains to the major hydrophobic core centered around a five-strand beta-barrel, whereas mutations that caused mGuHCl to decrease clustered around a second, smaller and less well-defined hydrophobic core. (2) The average stability loss for mutants in each of the six residue classes was 2-3 times greater than that estimated on the basis of the free energy of transfer of the hydrophobic side chain from water to n-octanol. (3) The magnitude of the stability loss on substituting Ala or Gly for a particular type of amino acid varied extensively among the different sites of its occurrence in nuclease, indicating that the environment surrounding a specific residue determines how large a stability contribution its side chain will make.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Guerois, R., Nielsen, J. E., & Serrano, L. (2002) · Journal of Molecular Biology · doi:10.1016/s0022-2836(02)00442-4 · Cited by 1,728
A Switch Between Two-, Three-, and Four-stranded Coiled Coils in GCN4 Leucine Zipper Mutants
Harbury, P. B., Zhang, T., Kim, P. S., & Alber, T. (1993) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.8248779 · Cited by 1,490
De novo design of the hydrophobic cores of proteins
Desjarlais, J. R., & Handel, T. M. (1995) · Protein Science · doi:10.1002/pro.5560041006 · Cited by 306
Free Energy Balance in Protein Folding
(1995) · Advances in Protein Chemistry · doi:10.1016/s0065-3233(08)60331-9 · Cited by 275
Predicting free energy changes using structural ensembles
Benedix, A., Becker, C. M., de Groot, B. L., Caflisch, A., & Böckmann, R. A. (2009) · Nature Methods · doi:10.1038/nmeth0109-3 · Cited by 234
Metadata
- Authors
- Shortle, D., Stites, W. E., & Meeker, A. K.
- Venue
- Biochemistry
- Publisher
- American Chemical Society (ACS)
- Published
- 1990-09-04
- Volume
- 29
- Issue
- 35
- Pages
- 8033-8041
- ISSN
- 0006-2960 (ISSN-L)
- 1520-4995
- OpenAlex
- W1966480910
- Cited by
- 371
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 11.08
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Contributions of the large hydrophobic amino acids to the stability of staphylococcal nuclease. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1021/bi00487a007
- The paper
- Shortle, D., Stites, W. E., & Meeker, A. K. (1990). Contributions of the large hydrophobic amino acids to the stability of staphylococcal nuclease. Biochemistry. https://doi.org/10.1021/bi00487a007
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.