Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 371

The DOI matches its Crossref record.

Contributions of the large hydrophobic amino acids to the stability of staphylococcal nuclease

Shortle, David, Stites, Wesley E., Meeker, Alan K.·1990·Biochemistry

Abstract

To quantitate the contributions of the large hydrophobic residues in staphylococcal nuclease to the stability of its native state, single alanine and glycine substitutions were constructed by site-directed mutagenesis for each of the 11 leucine, 9 valine, 7 tyrosine, 5 isoleucine, 4 methionine, and 3 phenylalanine residues. In addition, each isoleucine was also mutated to valine. The resulting collection of 83 mutant nucleases was submitted to guanidine hydrochloride denaturation using intrinsic tryptophan fluorescence to monitor the equilibrium constant between the native and denatured states. From analysis of these data, each mutant protein's stability to reversible denaturation (delta GH2O) and sensitivity to guanidine hydrochloride (mGuHCl or d(delta G)/d[GuHCl]) were obtained. Four unexpected trends were observed. (1) A striking bipartite distribution was found for sites of mutations that altered mGuHCl: mutations that increased this parameter only involved residues that contribute side chains to the major hydrophobic core centered around a five-strand beta-barrel, whereas mutations that caused mGuHCl to decrease clustered around a second, smaller and less well-defined hydrophobic core. (2) The average stability loss for mutants in each of the six residue classes was 2-3 times greater than that estimated on the basis of the free energy of transfer of the hydrophobic side chain from water to n-octanol. (3) The magnitude of the stability loss on substituting Ala or Gly for a particular type of amino acid varied extensively among the different sites of its occurrence in nuclease, indicating that the environment surrounding a specific residue determines how large a stability contribution its side chain will make.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1021/bi00487a007

Cites

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cited by

See all 371

Metadata

Authors
Shortle, D., Stites, W. E., & Meeker, A. K.
Venue
Biochemistry
Published
1990-09-04
Volume
29
Issue
35
Pages
8033-8041
ISSN
  • 0006-2960 (ISSN-L)
  • 1520-4995
OpenAlex
W1966480910
Cited by
371
References
0
FWCI
11.08
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Contributions of the large hydrophobic amino acids to the stability of staphylococcal nuclease. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1021/bi00487a007
The paper
Shortle, D., Stites, W. E., & Meeker, A. K. (1990). Contributions of the large hydrophobic amino acids to the stability of staphylococcal nuclease. Biochemistry. https://doi.org/10.1021/bi00487a007

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.