Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 184

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 2 of the 2 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Biophysical Properties of Camelid VHH Domains Compared to Those of Human VH3 Domains

Ewert, Stefan, Cambillau, Christian, Conrath, Katja, Plückthun, Andreas·2002·Biochemistry

Abstract

Camelidae possess an unusual form of antibodies lacking the light chains. The variable domain of these heavy chain antibodies (V(HH)) is not paired, while the V(H) domain of all other antibodies forms a heterodimer with the variable domain of the light chain (V(L)), held together by a hydrophobic interface. Here, we analyzed the biophysical properties of four camelid V(HH) fragments (H14, AMD9, RN05, and CA05) and two human consensus V(H)3 domains with different CDR3 loops to gain insight into factors determining stability and aggregation of immunoglobulin domains. We show by denaturant-induced unfolding equilibria that the free energies of unfolding of V(HH) fragments are characterized by Delta G(N-U) values between 21.1 and 35.0 kJ/mol and thus lie in the upper range of values for V(H) fragments from murine and human antibodies. Nevertheless, the V(HH) fragments studied here did not reach the high values between 39.7 and 52.7 kJ/mol of the human consensus V(H)3 domains with which they share the highest degree of sequence similarity. Temperature-induced unfolding of the V(HH) fragments that were studied proved to be reversible, and the binding affinity after cooling was fully retained. The melting temperatures were determined to be between 60.1 and 66.7 degrees C. In contrast, the studied V(H)3 domains aggregated during temperature-induced denaturation at 63-65 degrees C. In summary, the camelid V(HH) fragments are characterized by a favorable but not unusually high stability. Their hallmark is the ability to reversibly melt without aggregation, probably mediated by the surface mutations characterizing the V(HH) domains, which allow them to regain binding activity after heat renaturation.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1021/bi011239a

Cites

2 of 2 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 2 references

Cited by

See all 184

Metadata

Authors
Ewert, S., Cambillau, C., Conrath, K., & Plückthun, A.
Venue
Biochemistry
Published
2002-02-19
Volume
41
Issue
11
Pages
3628-3636
ISSN
  • 0006-2960 (ISSN-L)
  • 1520-4995
OpenAlex
W1980260012
Cited by
184
References
2
FWCI
6.37
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Biophysical Properties of Camelid VHH Domains Compared to Those of Human VH3 Domains. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1021/bi011239a
The paper
Ewert, S., Cambillau, C., Conrath, K., & Plückthun, A. (2002). Biophysical Properties of Camelid VHH Domains Compared to Those of Human VH3 Domains. Biochemistry. https://doi.org/10.1021/bi011239a

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.