Cited by 53

The DOI matches its Crossref record.

Novel Processing of β-Amyloid Precursor Protein Catalyzed by Membrane Type 1 Matrix Metalloproteinase Releases a Fragment Lacking the Inhibitor Domain against Gelatinase A

Higashi, Shouichi, Miyazaki, Kaoru·2003·Biochemistry

Abstract

In various mammalian cell lines, beta-amyloid precursor protein (APP) is proteolytically processed to release its NH(2)-terminal extracellular domain as a soluble APP (sAPP) that contains the inhibitor domain against gelatinase A. To investigate roles of sAPP in the regulation of gelatinase A activity, we examined the correlation between the activation of progelatinase A and processing of APP. We found that stimulation of HT1080 fibrosarcoma cells with concanavalin A led to an activation of endogenous progelatinase A and to a novel processing of APP, which releases a COOH-terminally truncated form of sAPP (sAPPtrc) into the culture medium. Reverse zymographic analysis showed that sAPPtrc lacked an inhibitory activity against gelatinase A. Analyses of production of sAPPtrc in the presence of various metalloproteinase inhibitors showed that membrane type 1 matrix metalloproteinase (MT1-MMP), an activator of progelatinase A, is most likely responsible for the production of sAPPtrc. When the concanavalin A-stimulated HT1080 cells were cultured in the condition that inhibited MT1-MMP activity, sAPP and APP were associated with the extracellular matrix deposited by the cells, whereas these gelatinase A inhibitors in the matrix were displaced by sAPPtrc after exertion of MT1-MMP activity. Taken together, these data support a model in which MT1-MMP-catalyzed release of sAPPtrc leads to reduction of the extracellular matrix-associated gelatinase A inhibitor, sAPP, thus making it feasi…

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1021/bi020643m

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Citations

Cites

No references could be resolved yet.

Research works printed but not linked: 53

  1. Kang J., 1987, Nature 325, 733−736
  2. Sisodia S. S., 1990, Science 248, 492−495
  3. Esch F. S., 1990, Science 248, 1122−1124
  4. Arribas J., 1996, J. Biol. Chem., 271, 10.1074/jbc.271.19.11376 · DOI
  5. Arribas J., 1997, J. Biol. Chem., 272, 10.1074/jbc.272.27.17160 · DOI
  6. Buxbaum J. D., 1998, J. Biol. Chem., 273, 10.1074/jbc.273.43.27765 · DOI
  7. Palmert M. R., 1989, Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 86, 6338−6342
  8. Podlisny M. B., 1990, Biochem. Biophys. Res. Commun. 167, 1094−1101
  9. Smith R. P., 1990, Science 248, 1126−1128
  10. Miyata S., 1999, J. Biochem. (Tokyo), 125, 10.1093/oxfordjournals.jbchem.a022388 · DOI
  11. Schubert D., 1989, Neuron 3, 689−694
  12. Chen M., 1991, Neurosci. Lett., 125, 10.1016/0304-3940(91)90034-Q · DOI
  13. Small D. H., 1994, J. Neurosci., 14, 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.14-04-02117.1994 · DOI
  14. Jin L. W., 1994, J. Neurosci., 14
  15. Mattson M. P., 1993, Neuron 10, 243−254
  16. Miyazaki K., 1993, Nature 362, 839−841
  17. Small D. H., 1992, J. Neurosci., 12
  18. Caceres J., 1997, J. Cell. Biochem., 65, 10.1002/(SICI)1097-4644(199705)65:2<145::AID-JCB2>3.0.CO;2-U · DOI
  19. Kibbey M. C., 1993, Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 90, 10150−10153
  20. Beher D., 1996, J. Biol. Chem., 271, 10.1074/jbc.271.3.1613 · DOI
  21. Ohsawa I., 2001, J. Neurochem., 76, 10.1046/j.1471-4159.2001.00144.x · DOI
  22. Docherty A. J. P., 1992, Trends Biotechnol. 10, 200−207
  23. Matrisian L. M., 1992, Bioessays 14, 455−463
  24. Stetler-Stevenson W. G., 1993, Annu. Rev. Cell Biol., 9, 10.1146/annurev.cb.09.110193.002545 · DOI
  25. Liotta L. A., 1986, Cancer Res., 46, 7
  26. Collier I. E., 1988, J. Biol. Chem., 263
  27. Wilhelm S. M., 1989, J. Biol. Chem., 264, 10.1016/S0021-9258(18)71480-4 · DOI
  28. Brooks P. C., 1998, Cell 92, 391−400
  29. Sato H., 1994, Nature, 370, 65, 10.1038/370061a0 · DOI
  30. Pei D., 1999, J. Biol. Chem., 274
  31. Pei D., 1999, Cell Res. 9, 291−303
  32. Yana I., 2002, Clin. Exp. Metastasis 19, 209−215
  33. Strongin A. Y., 1995, J. Biol. Chem., 270, 10.1074/jbc.270.10.5331 · DOI
  34. Higashi S., 1999, J. Biol. Chem., 274, 10.1074/jbc.274.15.10497 · DOI
  35. Miyazaki K., 1993, J. Biol. Chem., 268, 10.1016/S0021-9258(19)85251-1 · DOI
  36. Miyazaki K., 1990, Cancer Res. 50, 7758−7764
  37. Koshikawa N., 1996, J. Biochem. (Tokyo), 119, 10.1093/oxfordjournals.jbchem.a021244 · DOI
  38. Overall C. M., 1990, J. Biol. Chem., 265, 10.1016/S0021-9258(17)45338-5 · DOI
  39. Griffith M. J., 1982, J. Biol. Chem., 257
  40. Pratt C. W., 1992, J. Biol. Chem., 267
  41. Segel, I. H. (1975) Enzyme Kinetics, pp 320−329, Wiley-Interscience, New York.
  42. Howard E. W., 1991, J. Biol. Chem., 266
  43. Olson M. W., 1997, J. Biol. Chem., 272
  44. Will H., 1996, J. Biol. Chem., 271, 10.1074/jbc.271.29.17119 · DOI
  45. Zucker S., 1998, J. Biol. Chem., 273, 10.1074/jbc.273.2.1216 · DOI
  46. Stanton H., 1998, J. Cell Sci., 111, 10.1242/jcs.111.18.2789 · DOI
  47. Shofuda K., 1998, J. Biochem. (Tokyo), 124, 10.1093/oxfordjournals.jbchem.a022136 · DOI
  48. Nakahara H., 1997, Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 94, 7959−7964
  49. Murphy G., 1992, Biochem. J., 283
  50. Van Nostrand W. E., 1991, Biochem. Biophys. Res. Commun., 175, 21, 10.1016/S0006-291X(05)81193-3 · DOI
  51. Hernandez-Barrantes S., 2000, J. Biol. Chem., 275, 10.1074/jbc.275.16.12080 · DOI
  52. Higashi S., 2003, J. Biol. Chem., 278
  53. Abbreviations APP, β-amyloid precursor protein

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Metadata

Authors
Higashi, S., & Miyazaki, K.
Venue
Biochemistry
Published
2003-05-08
Volume
42
Issue
21
Pages
6514-6526
ISSN
  • 0006-2960
  • 1520-4995
Cited by
53
References
0
Language
en

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review