The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Kinetics and Pathways of Charge Recombination in Photosystem II
Abstract
The mechanism of charge recombination of the S(2)Q(A)(-) state in photosystem II was investigated by modifying the free energy gap between the quinone acceptor Q(A) and the primary pheophytin acceptor Ph. This was done either by changing the midpoint potential of Ph (using mutants of the cyanobacterium Synechocystis with a modified hydrogen bond to this cofactor), or that of Q(A) (using different inhibitors of the Q(B) pocket). The results show that the recombination rate is dependent on the free energy gap between Ph and Q(A), which confirms that the indirect recombination pathway involving formation of Ph(-) has a significant contribution. In the mutant with the largest free energy gap, direct electron transfer from Q(A)(-) to P(+) predominates. The temperature dependence of the recombination rate was investigated, showing a lower activation enthalpy in this mutant compared with the WT. The data allow the determination of the rate of the direct route and of its relative weight in the various strains. The set of currently accepted values for the midpoint potentials of the Q(A)/Q(A)(-), Ph/Ph(-), and P(+)/P* couples is not consistent with the relatively rapid rate of the indirect recombination pathway found here, nor with the 3% yield of delayed fluorescence as previously estimated by de Grooth and van Gorkom (1981, Biochim. Biophys. Acta 635, 445-456). It is argued that a likely explanation is that the midpoint potentials of the two latter couples are more positive than believed due to electrostatic interactions. If such is the case, the estimation of the midpoint potential of the P(+)/P and S(2)/S(1) couples must also be revised upward, with values of 1260 and 1020 mV, respectively.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Metal-free efficient photocatalyst for stable visible water splitting via a two-electron pathway
Liu, J., Liu, Y., Liu, N., Han, Y., Zhang, X., Huang, H., Lifshitz, Y., Lee, S.-T., Zhong, J., & Kang, Z. (2015) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.aaa3145 · Cited by 4,468
Architecture of the Photosynthetic Oxygen-Evolving Center
Ferreira, K. N., Iverson, T. M., Maghlaoui, K., Barber, J., & Iwata, S. (2004) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.1093087 · Cited by 3,329
The Mechanism of Water Oxidation: From Electrolysis via Homogeneous to Biological Catalysis
Dau, H., Limberg, C., Reier, T., Risch, M., Roggan, S., & Strasser, P. (2010) · ChemCatChem · doi:10.1002/cctc.201000126 · Cited by 1,783
Proton-coupled electron transfer
Huynh, M. H. V., & Meyer, T. J. (2007) · Chemical Reviews · doi:10.1021/cr0500030 · Cited by 1,659
Development of Bioinspired Mn4O4−Cubane Water Oxidation Catalysts: Lessons from Photosynthesis
Dismukes, G. C., Brimblecombe, R., Felton, G. A. N., Pryadun, R. S., Sheats, J. E., Spiccia, L., & Swiegers, G. F. (2009) · Accounts of Chemical Research · doi:10.1021/ar900249x · Cited by 549
Metadata
- Authors
- Rappaport, F., Guergova-Kuras, M., Nixon, P. J., Diner, B. A., & Lavergne, J.
- Venue
- Biochemistry
- Publisher
- American Chemical Society (ACS)
- Published
- 2002-05-25
- Volume
- 41
- Issue
- 26
- Pages
- 8518-8527
- ISSN
- 0006-2960 (ISSN-L)
- 1520-4995
- OpenAlex
- W2165896332
- Cited by
- 356
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 3.46
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Kinetics and Pathways of Charge Recombination in Photosystem II. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1021/bi025725p
- The paper
- Rappaport, F., Guergova-Kuras, M., Nixon, P. J., Diner, B. A., & Lavergne, J. (2002). Kinetics and Pathways of Charge Recombination in Photosystem II. Biochemistry. https://doi.org/10.1021/bi025725p
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.