Cited by 18Genomics and Chromatin DynamicsProtein Structure and DynamicsDiffusion and Search Dynamics

Cyclic AMP Response Element-Binding Protein (CREB) and CAAT/Enhancer-Binding Protein β (C/EBPβ) Bind Chimeric DNA Sites with High Affinity

Flammer, Jamie R., Popova, Katerina N., Pflum, Mary Kay H.·2006·Biochemistry

Abstract

Basic region leucine zipper (bZIP) proteins are transcription factors that interact selectively with duplex DNA to regulate gene expression. Specifically, the cAMP response element-binding protein (CREB) interacts with the cAMP response element (CRE) DNA site with high affinity, while it binds the CAAT/enhancer-binding protein (CEBP) DNA site with low affinity. Despite the selectivity of CREB for the CRE site, CREB-dependent transcription is observed via chimeric DNA sites with similarities to both CRE and CEBP sites. Because CRE/CEBP and CEBP/CRE chimeric DNA are relevant for transcription regulation but have not been rigorously characterized, quantitative electrophoretic mobility shift assays were used to characterize the binding affinity and specificity of CREB to the sites. In addition to CREB, C/EBPbeta was tested because chimeric DNA was shown to stabilize CREB-C/EBPbeta heterodimerization. Despite previous work, no CREB-C/EBPbeta heterodimer was observed in the presence of chimeric DNA; only CREB and C/EBPbeta homodimers were seen. The CREB homodimer bound to the chimeric sites with high affinity, demonstrating that the presence of one CRE half-site is sufficient for high-affinity interaction. A comparison of CREB and C/EBPbeta homodimers indicated that they bind the chimeric sites with similar, high affinity. Whereas the CRE and CEBP sites preferentially interact with CREB and C/EBPbeta, respectively, the chimeric sites bind CREB and C/EBPbeta competitively. Because D…

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1021/bi052521a

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Flammer, J. R., Popova, K. N., & Pflum, M. K. H.
Affiliations
Wayne State University (US)
Venue
Biochemistry
Published
2006-07-13
Volume
45
Issue
31
Pages
9615-9623
ISSN
  • 0006-2960 (ISSN-L)
  • 1520-4995
OpenAlex
W2057037301
Cited by
18
References
0
Citations by year
2019: 2 · 2018: 1 · 2017: 1 · 2016: 1 · 2013: 1
FWCI
1.36
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Biochemistry (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Genomics and Chromatin Dynamics
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Protein Structure and Dynamics
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Diffusion and Search Dynamics
Keywords
CREB, C/EBPβ, cAMP response element, bZIP transcription factors, DNA binding affinity, DNA binding specificity, protein homodimerization, protein heterodimerization, transcriptional regulation
MeSH terms
Animals, Base Sequence, Binding Sites, Binding, Competitive, DNA, DNA-Binding Proteins, Gene Expression Regulation, Humans, Transcription, Genetic, Cyclic AMP Response Element-Binding Protein, CCAAT-Enhancer-Binding Protein-beta, Electrophoretic Mobility Shift Assay, Rats

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review