The natively unfolded character of tau and its aggregation to Alzheimer-like paired helical filaments
Abstract
The abnormal aggregation of the microtubule-associated protein Tau into paired helical filaments (PHFs) is one of the hallmarks of Alzheimer disease (AD). Tau in solution behaves as a natively unfolded or intrinsically disordered protein while its aggregation is based on the partial structural transition from random coil to beta-structure. Our aim is to understand in more detail the unfolded nature of Tau, to investigate the aggregation of Tau under different conditions and the molecular interactions of Tau in filaments. We show that soluble Tau remains natively unfolded even when its net charge is minimized, in contrast to other unfolded proteins. The CD signature of the random-coil character of Tau shows no major change over wide variations in charge (pH), ionic strength, solvent polarity, and denaturation. Thus there is no indication of a hydrophobicity-driven collapse, neither in the microtubule-binding repeat domain constructs nor in full-length Tau. This argues that the lack of hydrophobic residues but not the net charge accounts for unfolded nature of soluble Tau. The aggregation of the Tau repeat domain (that forms the core of PHFs) in the presence of nucleating polyanionic cofactors (heparin) is efficient in a range of buffers and pH values between approximately 5 and 10 but breaks down beyond that range, presumably because the pattern of charged interactions disappears. Similarly, elevated ionic strength attenuates aggregation, and the temperature dependence is bell…
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
K18 aggregates significantly faster than K19.
“This protein aggregates significantly faster than K19, the corresponding three-repeat version (38, 39) (Fig. 1B).”
From MAP2 caps tau fibrils and inhibits aggregation (2023) · cites this paper as [39]
No citation lists for this paper
No citation lists for this paper yet — checked again daily.
References 65 · Cited by 286
- Authors
- Jeganathan, S., von Bergen, M., Mandelkow, E.-M., & Mandelkow, E.
- Affiliations
- Max Planck Unit for Structural Molecular Biology, Notkestrasse 85, D-22607 Hamburg, Germany
- Max Planck Unit for Structural Molecular Biology (DE)
- ORCID
- Mandelkow, Eva-Maria
- Venue
- Biochemistry
- Publisher
- American Chemical Society (ACS)
- Published
- 2008-09-11
- Volume
- 47
- Issue
- 40
- Pages
- 10526-10539
- ISSN
- 0006-2960 (ISSN-L)
- 1520-4995
- OpenAlex
- W2049391304
- Cited by
- 286
- References
- 65
- Citations by year
- 2026: 18 · 2025: 14 · 2024: 23 · 2023: 26 · 2022: 20 · 2021: 15 · 2020: 22 · 2019: 25 · 2018: 14 · 2017: 17 · 2016: 16 · 2015: 13 · 2014: 12 · 2013: 9 · 2012: 14
- FWCI
- 6.32
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Biochemistry (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Max Planck Institute for Plasma Physics (submittedVersion)
- Topics
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Physiology › Alzheimer's disease research and treatments
- Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Protein Structure and Dynamics
- Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Protein purification and stability
- Keywords
- tau protein, paired helical filaments, Alzheimer's disease, intrinsically disordered proteins, protein aggregation, salt bridges, net charge, heparin cofactor, filament stability, hydrophobic interactions, cross-β structure, pH dependence, denaturation
- MeSH terms
- Alzheimer Disease, Circular Dichroism, Humans, Hydrogen-Ion Concentration, Microscopy, Electron, Scanning, Models, Biological, Solvents, Temperature, tau Proteins, Neurofilament Proteins, Protein Folding, Hydrophobic and Hydrophilic Interactions
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review