The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Identification of Two Functionally Different Classes of Exocellulases
Abstract
There are two classes of synergism in cellulase mixtures: synergism between endocellulases and exocellulases, and synergism between certain exocellulases. Exocellulases have been defined traditionally as releasing cellobiose from the nonreducing ends of cellulose, but this definition is inadequate to explain exo/exo synergism. Several recent reports indicate that some exocellulases are capable of hydrolyzing cellulose from the reducing end. The existence of two exocellulase classes with different specificities could provide an explanation for exo/exo synergism. In this paper, we report the substrate specificity of three Thermomonospora fusca (E3, E4, and E6) and two Trichoderma reesei (CBH I and CBH II) exocellulases on labeled cellooligosaccharides. We describe a new nonradioactive technique for determining substrate specificity, in which ion-spray mass spectrometry was used to analyze the products of enzymatic digests of cellopentaose labeled with 18O at the reducing end. Exocellulase reactivity was also investigated on cellopentaose labeled at the nonreducing end with 14C, and cellooligosaccharides reduced with NaBH4. The distribution of label in the reaction products supports the existence of two functional classes of exocellulases. One class (containing CBH I, E4, and E6) preferentially cleaves cellooligosaccharides from the reducing end, while the other (containing E3 and CBH II) preferentially cleaves from the nonreducing end. This classification of exocellulases is consistent with exo/exo synergism experiments, and with published cellulase crystallographic data.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
New families in the classification of glycosyl hydrolases based on amino acid sequence similarities
Henrissat, B., & Bairoch, A. (1993) · Biochemical Journal · doi:10.1042/bj2930781 · Cited by 1,974
Cited by
Zhang, Y. P., & Lynd, L. R. (2004) · Biotechnology and Bioengineering · doi:10.1002/bit.20282 · Cited by 1,893
Payne, C. M., Knott, B. C., Mayes, H. B., Hansson, H., Himmel, M. E., Sandgren, M., Ståhlberg, J., & Beckham, G. T. (2015) · Chemical Reviews · doi:10.1021/cr500351c · Cited by 855
Divne, C., Ståhlberg, J., Teeri, T. T., & Jones, T. A. (1998) · Journal of Molecular Biology · doi:10.1006/jmbi.1997.1437 · Cited by 434
Metadata
- Authors
- Barr, B. K., Hsieh, Y.-L., Ganem, B., & Wilson, D. B.
- Venue
- Biochemistry
- Publisher
- American Chemical Society (ACS)
- Published
- 1996-01-01
- Volume
- 35
- Issue
- 2
- Pages
- 586-592
- ISSN
- 0006-2960 (ISSN-L)
- 1520-4995
- OpenAlex
- W2060811229
- Cited by
- 281
- References
- 1
- FWCI
- 13.40
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.