The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Interaction of Vinca Alkaloids with Tubulin: A Comparison of Vinblastine, Vincristine, and Vinorelbine
Abstract
Vinca alkaloids are antimitotic drugs that inhibit microtubule assembly and induce tubulin self-association into coiled spiral aggregates. Previous sedimentation velocity results with vinblastine have been interpreted by a mechanism involving isodesmic ligand-mediated or ligand-mediated plus ligand-facilitated self-association [Lobert et al. (1995) Biochemistry 34, 8050-8060]. In this study, we compare the vincristine- or vinorelbine-induced self-association of porcine brain tubulin with our prior vinblastine studies in the presence of 50 microM GDP or 50 microM GTP. Vincristine demonstrates the highest overall affinity for tubulin, K1K2, and vinorelbine the lowest (vincristine > vinblastine > vinorelbine). These and the first quantitative studies comparing the interaction of a new vinca alkaloid derivative, vinorelbine (Navelbine), with other vinca alkaloids. The relative binding affinities reported here correlate with the weekly drug doses used clinically in cancer chemotherapy, where vincristine is used at the lowest dosages and vinorelbine at the highest. Surprisingly, K1, the affinity of drug for tubulin heterodimers, is identical for all three drugs. When data are fit with the ligand-mediated model, the differences in overall affinity are due to effects on K2, the affinity of liganded heterodimers for spiral polymers. When data are fit with the ligand-mediated plus-facilitated model, affinity differences are also reflected in K3, the binding of the drug to unliganded polymers. We find that GDP enhances self-association in the presence of all three drugs 3-5-fold over GTP. The enhancement is manifested in K2 and K3 and amounts to an average of 0.90 +/= 0.17 kcal/mol. Thus, nucleotide enhancement is linked to the self-association step. Data collected at 5, 25, and 36 degrees C for all three drugs show increased maximum s-20,w values with increasing temperature and are consistent with an entropically driven reaction for the overall process. To investigate these results further, stopped-flow light scattering experiments have been conducted. Relaxation times are longest for the largest vincristine polymers and shortest for the smallest vinorelbine polymers, consistent with a cascade of events corresponding to successive dissociation events from spiral polymers, the larger the polymers the longer the relaxation time. Relaxation times for any single drug decrease with increasing tubulin concentration, consistent with the occurrence of oligomer annealing in addition to the association of liganded heterodimers to the ends of the growing spirals. Relaxation times were used to estimate on and off rates for liganded heterodimer association with spirals, and their ratio gives affinity constants (Kapp) that are independently consistent with K2 estimates from sedimentation velocity results for vinblastine and vinorelbine. For vincristine-induced tubulin polymers, a two-step process is observed with a second relaxation time more than 20-fold longer than times observed for vinblastine or vinorelbine. Sedimentation velocity experiments at low speeds and electron microscopy are consistent with the presence of a small amount of larger polymers (> or = 40S) in the vincristine samples, possibly involving alignment of spirals. Under our experimental conditions, these larger polymers appear to have a minimal effect on the estimated energetics of the vincristine-induced self-association of tubulin.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Perez, E. A. (2009) · Molecular Cancer Therapeutics · doi:10.1158/1535-7163.mct-09-0366 · Cited by 521
Grisold, W., Cavaletti, G., & Windebank, A. J. (2012) · Neuro-Oncology · doi:10.1093/neuonc/nos203 · Cited by 486
Chemotherapy-induced neuropathy: A comprehensive survey
Miltenburg, N. C., & Boogerd, W. (2014) · Cancer Treatment Reviews · doi:10.1016/j.ctrv.2014.04.004 · Cited by 431
Chemotherapy-induced peripheral neuropathy: What do we know about mechanisms?
Carozzi, V. A., Canta, A., & Chiorazzi, A. (2015) · Neuroscience Letters · doi:10.1016/j.neulet.2014.10.014 · Cited by 431
Chemotherapy-induced peripheral neurotoxicity
Cavaletti, G., & Marmiroli, P. (2010) · Nature Reviews Neurology · doi:10.1038/nrneurol.2010.160 · Cited by 351
Metadata
- Authors
- Lobert, S., Vulevic, B., & Correia, J. J.
- Venue
- Biochemistry
- Publisher
- American Chemical Society (ACS)
- Published
- 1996-01-01
- Volume
- 35
- Issue
- 21
- Pages
- 6806-6814
- ISSN
- 0006-2960 (ISSN-L)
- 1520-4995
- OpenAlex
- W2102981736
- Cited by
- 212
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 2.27
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Interaction of Vinca Alkaloids with Tubulin: A Comparison of Vinblastine, Vincristine, and Vinorelbine. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1021/bi953037i
- The paper
- Lobert, S., Vulevic, B., & Correia, J. J. (1996). Interaction of Vinca Alkaloids with Tubulin: A Comparison of Vinblastine, Vincristine, and Vinorelbine. Biochemistry. https://doi.org/10.1021/bi953037i
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.