Phosphorylation states of microtubule-associated protein 2 (MAP2) determine the regulatory role of MAP2 in microtubule dynamics
Abstract
Phosphorylation-dependent regulation of microtubule-stabilizing activities of microtubule-associated protein 2 (MAP2) was examined using optical microscopy. MAP2, purified from mammalian brain, was phosphorylated by either cAMP-dependent protein kinase (PKA) or cyclin B-dependent cdc2 kinase. Using PKA, 15 mol of phosphoryl groups was incorporated per mole of MAP2, but about 70% of the phosphates was distributed to the projection region. Using cdc2 kinase, 7-10 mol of phosphoryl groups was incorporated per mole of MAP2, and more than 60% of the phosphates was distributed to the microtubule-binding region. Both types of phosphorylation similarly reduced binding activity of MAP2 onto microtubules. Direct observation of individual microtubules using dark-field microscopy showed that interconversion between the polymerization phase and the depolymerization phase was repeated in both unphosphorylated and PKA-phosphorylated MAP2. In cdc2 kinase-phosphorylated MAP2, however, the phase transition from depolymerization to polymerization occurred with difficulty, with the result being that the half-life of individual microtubules was as short as in the absence of MAP2. Examination of spontaneous polymerization of microtubules using dark-field microscopy showed that the microtubule-nucleating activity of MAP2 was reduced by PKA-dependent phosphorylation and was completely abolished by cdc2 kinase-dependent phosphorylation. These observations show that cdc2 kinase-dependent phosphorylati…
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
MAP2 binds to MTs quite stably in in vitro binding assays.
“This was surprising because MAP2 binds to MTs quite stably in in vitro binding assays (42).”
From Active transport by cytoplasmic dynein sustains dendritic MAP2 localization in developing neurons (2026) · cites this paper as [42]
No citation lists for this paper
No citation lists for this paper yet — checked again daily.
References 31 · Cited by 84
- Authors
- Itoh, T. J., Hisanaga, S.-I., Hosoi, T., Kishimoto, T., & Hotani, H.
- Affiliations
- Tokyo Institute of Technology (JP)
- Venue
- Biochemistry
- Publisher
- American Chemical Society (ACS)
- Published
- 1997-10-01
- Volume
- 36
- Issue
- 41
- Pages
- 12574-12582
- ISSN
- 0006-2960 (ISSN-L)
- 1520-4995
- OpenAlex
- W2052952793
- Cited by
- 84
- References
- 31
- Citations by year
- 2026: 1 · 2025: 4 · 2023: 2 · 2022: 1 · 2021: 2 · 2019: 2 · 2018: 2 · 2017: 2 · 2016: 2 · 2015: 3 · 2014: 2 · 2013: 2
- FWCI
- 1.48
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Biochemistry (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Cell Biology › Microtubule and mitosis dynamics
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Oncology › Cancer Treatment and Pharmacology
- Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Developmental Neuroscience › Neurogenesis and neuroplasticity mechanisms
- Keywords
- MAP2, MAP2 phosphorylation, microtubule dynamics, microtubule stabilization, microtubule nucleation, protein kinase A, cdc2 kinase, cyclin B, microtubule-binding region, microtubule assembly, microtubule depolymerization, dark-field microscopy
- MeSH terms
- Animals, Cattle, Microtubule-Associated Proteins, Microtubules, Phosphorylation, Swine, CDC2 Protein Kinase, Cyclic AMP-Dependent Protein Kinases
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review