Cited by 84Microtubule and mitosis dynamicsCancer Treatment and PharmacologyNeurogenesis and neuroplasticity mechanisms

Phosphorylation states of microtubule-associated protein 2 (MAP2) determine the regulatory role of MAP2 in microtubule dynamics

Itoh, Tomohiko J., Hisanaga, Shin-ichi, Hosoi, Tomoko, Kishimoto, Takeo, Hotani, Hirokazu·1997·Biochemistry

Abstract

Phosphorylation-dependent regulation of microtubule-stabilizing activities of microtubule-associated protein 2 (MAP2) was examined using optical microscopy. MAP2, purified from mammalian brain, was phosphorylated by either cAMP-dependent protein kinase (PKA) or cyclin B-dependent cdc2 kinase. Using PKA, 15 mol of phosphoryl groups was incorporated per mole of MAP2, but about 70% of the phosphates was distributed to the projection region. Using cdc2 kinase, 7-10 mol of phosphoryl groups was incorporated per mole of MAP2, and more than 60% of the phosphates was distributed to the microtubule-binding region. Both types of phosphorylation similarly reduced binding activity of MAP2 onto microtubules. Direct observation of individual microtubules using dark-field microscopy showed that interconversion between the polymerization phase and the depolymerization phase was repeated in both unphosphorylated and PKA-phosphorylated MAP2. In cdc2 kinase-phosphorylated MAP2, however, the phase transition from depolymerization to polymerization occurred with difficulty, with the result being that the half-life of individual microtubules was as short as in the absence of MAP2. Examination of spontaneous polymerization of microtubules using dark-field microscopy showed that the microtubule-nucleating activity of MAP2 was reduced by PKA-dependent phosphorylation and was completely abolished by cdc2 kinase-dependent phosphorylation. These observations show that cdc2 kinase-dependent phosphorylati…

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1021/bi962606z

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

No citation lists for this paper

No citation lists for this paper yet — checked again daily.

References 31 · Cited by 84

Authors
Itoh, T. J., Hisanaga, S.-I., Hosoi, T., Kishimoto, T., & Hotani, H.
Affiliations
Tokyo Institute of Technology (JP)
Venue
Biochemistry
Published
1997-10-01
Volume
36
Issue
41
Pages
12574-12582
ISSN
  • 0006-2960 (ISSN-L)
  • 1520-4995
OpenAlex
W2052952793
Cited by
84
References
31
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2025: 4 · 2023: 2 · 2022: 1 · 2021: 2 · 2019: 2 · 2018: 2 · 2017: 2 · 2016: 2 · 2015: 3 · 2014: 2 · 2013: 2
FWCI
1.48
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Biochemistry (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Cell Biology › Microtubule and mitosis dynamics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Oncology › Cancer Treatment and Pharmacology
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Developmental Neuroscience › Neurogenesis and neuroplasticity mechanisms
Keywords
MAP2, MAP2 phosphorylation, microtubule dynamics, microtubule stabilization, microtubule nucleation, protein kinase A, cdc2 kinase, cyclin B, microtubule-binding region, microtubule assembly, microtubule depolymerization, dark-field microscopy
MeSH terms
Animals, Cattle, Microtubule-Associated Proteins, Microtubules, Phosphorylation, Swine, CDC2 Protein Kinase, Cyclic AMP-Dependent Protein Kinases

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review