The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Zn(II) Dependence of the Aeromonas hydrophila AE036 Metallo-β-lactamase Activity and Stability
Open accessAbstract
Two Zn2+ binding sites were found in the Aeromonas hydrophila AE036 metallo-beta-lactamase. The affinity of the first binding site for Zn2+ ions is so high that the dissociation constant could not be determined, but it is significantly lower than 20 nM. The mono-Zn2+ form of the enzyme exhibits a maximum activity against its carbapenem substrates. The presence of a Zn2+ ion in the second lower affinity binding site results in a loss of enzymatic activity with a Ki value of 46 microM at pH 6.5. The kinetic analysis is in agreement with a noncompetitive inhibition mechanism. The Zn content of the A. hydrophila enzyme is also strongly pH-dependent. With an external Zn2+ ion concentration of 0.4 microM, occupancy of the higher affinity site by metal ions is lower than 10% at pH 5 and 10. The affinity for the second binding site seems to increase from pH 6 to 7.5. Fluorescence emission and circular dichroism spectra revealed slight conformational changes upon titration of the apoenzyme by Zn2+ ions, resulting in the successive saturation of the first and second binding sites. Differential scanning calorimetry transitions and intrinsic fluorescence emission spectra in the presence of increasing concentrations of urea demonstrate that the catalytic zinc strongly stabilizes the conformation of the enzyme whereas the di-Zn enzyme is even more resistant to thermal and urea denaturation than the mono-Zn enzyme. The Zn2+ dependency of the activity of this metallo-beta-lactamase thus appears to be very different from that of the homologous Bacteroides fragilis enzyme for which the presence of two Zn2+ ions per molecule of protein appears to result in maximum activity.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Updated Functional Classification of β-Lactamases
Bush, K., & Jacoby, G. A. (2010) · Antimicrobial Agents and Chemotherapy · doi:10.1128/aac.01009-09 · Cited by 2,367
Three Decades of β-Lactamase Inhibitors
Drawz, S. M., & Bonomo, R. A. (2010) · Clinical Microbiology Reviews · doi:10.1128/cmr.00037-09 · Cited by 1,709
Zinc coordination sphere in biochemical zinc sites
Auld, D. S. (2001) · Biometals · doi:10.1023/a:1012976615056 · Cited by 721
Aspergillomarasmine A overcomes metallo-β-lactamase antibiotic resistance
King, A. M., Reid-Yu, S. A., Wang, W., King, D. T., De Pascale, G., Strynadka, N. C., Walsh, T. R., Coombes, B. K., & Wright, G. D. (2014) · Nature · doi:10.1038/nature13445 · Cited by 554
Ullah, J. H., Walsh, T. R., Taylor, I. A., Emery, D. C., Verma, C. S., Gamblin, S. J., & Spencer, J. (1998) · Journal of Molecular Biology · doi:10.1006/jmbi.1998.2148 · Cited by 337
Metadata
- Authors
- Hernandez Valladares, M., Felici, A., Weber, G., Adolph, H. W., Zeppezauer, M., Rossolini, G. M., Amicosante, G., Frère, J.-M., & Galleni, M.
- Venue
- Biochemistry
- Publisher
- American Chemical Society (ACS)
- Published
- 1997-09-01
- Volume
- 36
- Issue
- 38
- Pages
- 11534-11541
- ISSN
- 0006-2960 (ISSN-L)
- 1520-4995
- OpenAlex
- W2313929885
- Cited by
- 176
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 3.18
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Zn(II) Dependence of the Aeromonas hydrophila AE036 Metallo-β-lactamase Activity and Stability. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1021/bi971056h
- The paper
- Hernandez Valladares, M., Felici, A., Weber, G., Adolph, H. W., Zeppezauer, M., Rossolini, G. M., Amicosante, G., Frère, J.-M., & Galleni, M. (1997). Zn(II) Dependence of the Aeromonas hydrophila AE036 Metallo-β-lactamase Activity and Stability. Biochemistry. https://doi.org/10.1021/bi971056h
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.