Cited by 59Microtubule and mitosis dynamicsForce Microscopy Techniques and ApplicationsCellular Mechanics and Interactions

One-Headed Kinesin Derivatives Move by a Nonprocessive, Low-Duty Ratio Mechanism Unlike That of Two-Headed Kinesin

Young, Edgar C., Mahtani, Hansraj K., Gelles, Jeff·1998·Biochemistry

Abstract

A single molecule of the "two-headed" motor enzyme kinesin can move along a microtubule continuously for many enzymatic turnovers (processive movement), and the velocity produced by one kinesin molecule is the same as that produced by many kinesin molecules (high duty ratio). We studied the microtubule movement driven at 1 mM ATP by biotinated N-terminal fragments of Drosophila kinesin heavy chain attached to streptavidin-coated coverslips at various surface densities. K448-BIO has velocity at a high density of vmax = 750 nm s-1 and is dimeric (hence two-headed); K365-BIO (vmax = 200 nm s-1) and K340-BIO (vmax = 90 nm s-1) are monomeric. Escape of microtubules from the surface was prevented by methylcellulose so that continuous trajectories of microtubules not continuously attached to motor molecules could be recorded by video microscopy. The component of instantaneous velocity parallel to the microtubule axis (v) was analyzed in trajectories with a mean velocity 0.4-0.7 times vmax. In K448-BIO trajectories, the distribution of v was bimodal with peaks near 0 and 750 nm s-1. Temporal autocorrelation analysis of v detected lengthy episodes of high-velocity movement consistent with isolated processive microtubule runs driven at vmax by single K448-BIO dimers. K365-BIO and K340-BIO trajectories had unimodal distributions of v and autocorrelation times much shorter than those for K448-BIO. Therefore the monomeric motors have duty ratio < 55% (i.e., no forward movement is generate…

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1021/bi972172n

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Processive behavior of kinesin requires that the two motor domains remain in different structural and enzymatic states during a processive run.

    “this processive behavior requires that two motors of kinesin remain in different structural and enzymatic states during a processive run”

    From Stepping and Stretching (2003) · cites this paper as [10]

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Young, E. C., Mahtani, H. K., & Gelles, J.
Affiliations
Brandeis University (US)
Corresponding author
Gelles, Jeff
Venue
Biochemistry
Published
1998-02-11
Volume
37
Issue
10
Pages
3467-3479
ISSN
  • 0006-2960 (ISSN-L)
  • 1520-4995
OpenAlex
W1971655236
Cited by
59
References
0
Citations by year
2025: 1 · 2024: 3 · 2022: 3 · 2021: 1 · 2020: 1 · 2019: 2 · 2018: 1 · 2017: 1 · 2013: 2 · 2012: 1
FWCI
2.57
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Biochemistry (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Cell Biology › Microtubule and mitosis dynamics
  • Physical Sciences › Physics and Astronomy › Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics › Force Microscopy Techniques and Applications
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Cell Biology › Cellular Mechanics and Interactions
Keywords
kinesin, processivity, duty cycle, microtubule motility, single-molecule trajectories, temporal autocorrelation
MeSH terms
Adenosine Triphosphate, Animals, Cattle, Drosophila, Escherichia coli, Kinetics, Methylcellulose, Microtubules, Movement, Peptide Fragments, Recombinant Proteins, Kinesins, In Vitro Techniques

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review