The DOI matches its Crossref record; 2 of the 2 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Raman Spectroscopic Study on the Copper(II) Binding Mode of Prion Octapeptide and Its pH Dependence
Abstract
The cellular form of prion protein is a precursor of the infectious isoform, which causes fatal neurodegenerative diseases through intermolecular association. One of the characteristics of the prion protein is a high affinity for Cu(II) ions. The site of Cu(II) binding is considered to be the N-terminal region, where the octapeptide sequence PHGGGWGQ repeats 4 times in tandem. We have examined the Cu(II) binding mode of the octapeptide motif and its pH dependence by Raman and absorption spectroscopy. At neutral and basic pH, the single octapeptide PHGGGWGQ forms a 1:1 complex with Cu(II) by coordinating via the imidazole N pi atom of histidine together with two deprotonated main-chain amide nitrogens in the triglycine segment. A similar 1:1 complex is formed by each octapeptide unit in (PHGGGWGQ)2 and (PHGGGWGQ)4. Under weakly acidic conditions (pH approximately 6), however, the Cu(II)-amide- linkages are broken and the metal binding site of histidine switches from N pi to N tau to share a Cu(II) ion between two histidine residues of different peptide chains. The drastic change of the Cu(II) binding mode on going from neutral to weakly acidic conditions suggests that the micro-environmental pH in the brain cell regulates the Cu(II) affinity of the prion protein, which is supposed to undergo pH changes in the pathway from the cell surface to endosomes. The intermolecular His(N tau)-Cu(II)-His(N tau) bridge may be related to the aggregation of prion protein in the pathogenic form.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Sundberg, R. J., & Martin, R. B. (1974) · Chemical Reviews · doi:10.1021/cr60290a003 · Cited by 1,147
Miura, T., Takeuchi, H., & Harada, I. (1988) · Biochemistry · doi:10.1021/bi00401a015 · Cited by 241
Self-citation
Cited by
Metals in Neurobiology: Probing Their Chemistry and Biology with Molecular Imaging
Que, E. L., Domaille, D. W., & Chang, C. J. (2008) · Chemical Reviews · doi:10.1021/cr078203u · Cited by 2,061
Gaggelli, E., Kozlowski, H., Valensin, D., & Valensin, G. (2006) · Chemical Reviews · doi:10.1021/cr040410w · Cited by 1,729
Physiology of the prion protein
Linden, R., Martins, V. R., Prado, M. A. M., Cammarota, M., Izquierdo, I., & Brentani, R. R. (2008) · Physiological Reviews · doi:10.1152/physrev.00007.2007 · Cited by 617
Brunk, E., & Rothlisberger, U. (2015) · Chemical Reviews · doi:10.1021/cr500628b · Cited by 494
Molecular Features of the Copper Binding Sites in the Octarepeat Domain of the Prion Protein
Burns, C. S., Aronoff-Spencer, E., Dunham, C. M., Lario, P., Avdievich, N. I., Antholine, W. E., Olmstead, M. M., Vrielink, A., Gerfen, G. J., Peisach, J., et al. (2002) · Biochemistry · doi:10.1021/bi011922x · Cited by 417
Metadata
- Authors
- Miura, T., Hori-i, A., Mototani, H., & Takeuchi, H.
- Venue
- Biochemistry
- Publisher
- American Chemical Society (ACS)
- Published
- 1999-08-01
- Volume
- 38
- Issue
- 35
- Pages
- 11560-11569
- ISSN
- 0006-2960 (ISSN-L)
- 1520-4995
- OpenAlex
- W2052706468
- Cited by
- 256
- References
- 2
- FWCI
- 5.22
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.