Methane/Nitrogen Gas Separation over the Zeolite Clinoptilolite by the Selective Adsorption of Nitrogen
Abstract
N 2 diffuses into the structural pores of clinoptilolite 10 3 to 10 4 times faster than does CH 4 . Thus internal surfaces are kinetically selective for N 2 adsorption. Some clino samples are more effective at N 2 /CH 4 separation than others and this property was correlated with the zeolite surface cation population. An incompletely exchanged clino containing doubly charged cations appears to be the most selective for N 2 . Using a computer-controlled pressure swing adsorption apparatus, several process variables were studied in multiple cycle experiments. These included feed composition and rates, and adsorber temperature, pressure and regeneration conditions. N 2 diffusive flux reverses after about 60 seconds, but CH 4 adsorption continues. This causes a decay in the observed N 2 /CH 4 separation. Therefore, optimum process conditions include rapid adsorber pressurization and short adsorption/desorption/regeneration cycles.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Natural clinoptilolites in original and calcium-exchanged forms have been studied as adsorbents that kinetically distinguish between nitrogen and methane.
“Natural clinoptilolites in their original and calcium-exchanged forms have been studied as adsorbents that kinetically distinguish between nitrogen and methane.455”
From Zeolites in Adsorption Processes: State of the Art and Future Prospects (2022) · cites this paper as [455]
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Zeolites in Adsorption Processes: State of the Art and Future Prospects
Pérez-Botella, E., Valencia, S., & Rey, F. (2022) · Chemical Reviews · doi:10.1021/acs.chemrev.2c00140 · Cited by 1,126 · see citing works
Adsorption equilibria and kinetics of CO2, CH4 and N2 in natural zeolites
Hernández-Huesca, R., Dı́az, L., & Aguilar-Armenta, G. (1999) · Separation and Purification Technology · doi:10.1016/s1383-5866(98)00094-x · Cited by 167 · see citing works
Pérez-Botella, E., Palomino, M., Valencia, S., & Rey, F. (2019) · Green Energy and Technology · doi:10.1007/978-981-13-3504-4_7 · Cited by 29 · see citing works
- Authors
- FRANKIEWICZ, T. C., & DONNELLY, R. G.
- Affiliations
- Occidental Research Corporation, PO Box 19601, Irvine, CA 92713
- Venue
- ACS Symposium Series
- Publisher
- AMERICAN CHEMICAL SOCIETY
- Published
- 1983-06-16
- Pages
- 213-233
- ISSN
- 0097-6156 (ISSN-L)
- 1947-5918
- OpenAlex
- W2504890900
- Cited by
- 26
- References
- 0
- Citations by year
- 2023: 1 · 2022: 1 · 2021: 2 · 2020: 1 · 2019: 3 · 2018: 1 · 2017: 2 · 2014: 1
- FWCI
- 0.00
- Type
- conference paper
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- ACS symposium series (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Physical Sciences › Chemistry › Inorganic Chemistry › Zeolite Catalysis and Synthesis
- Physical Sciences › Engineering › Mechanical Engineering › Carbon Dioxide Capture Technologies
- Physical Sciences › Engineering › Mechanical Engineering › Membrane Separation and Gas Transport
- Keywords
- clinoptilolite, zeolite adsorption, selective adsorption, kinetic selectivity, pressure swing adsorption, adsorption-desorption cycles, adsorbent regeneration
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review