Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 376

The DOI matches its Crossref record.

Environmental Geochemistry of Sulfide Oxidation

·1993·ACS Symposium Series

Abstract

We measured the rates of reaction of Fe(III) with galena, sphalerite, chalcopyrite, and arsenopyrite at 25°C and pH values near two and found: Where rFe3+ is the rate of reduction of Fe(III) to Fe(II) (mol sec-1), mFe3+ is the concentration of Fe(III) (mol kg-1), and A is the surface area of the solid (m2) exposed to the solution. These results show that the reaction rates, the reaction orders and the activation energies vary substantially from mineral to mineral indicating that the details of the reaction mechanism differ among the various sulfide minerals. This means that pyrite cannot be used as a proxy for these other sulfide minerals when studying the details of sulfide mineral oxidation.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1021/bk-1994-0550

Cites

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cited by

See all 376

Metadata

Venue
ACS Symposium Series
Published
1993-12-20
ISSN
  • 0097-6156 (ISSN-L)
  • 1947-5918
OpenAlex
W1441423521
Cited by
376
References
0
FWCI
33.04
Type
conference paper
Language
en
Open access
closed

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Environmental Geochemistry of Sulfide Oxidation. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1021/bk-1994-0550
The paper
Environmental Geochemistry of Sulfide Oxidation. (1993). ACS Symposium Series. https://doi.org/10.1021/bk-1994-0550

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.