The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Free-Enzyme Bioremediation of Pesticides: A Case Study for the Enzymatic Remediation of Organophosphorous Insecticide Residues
Abstract
Free-enzyme bioremediation is a recently developed technology that allows rapid detoxification of pesticide residues in surface waters, such as irrigation tail water, and potentially from other wettable materials such as soil and the surfaces of commodities. Here we consider the advantages of this technology compared with other pesticide bioremediation strategies, as well as its current limitations and challenges for the future. We exemplify the development of free-enzyme bioremediants with a case study, the Landguard TM OP-A organophosphate bioremediant, highlighting the enzymatic, physical and toxicological properties of the enzyme that predispose it to be an effective and efficient environmental bioremediant and the applications explored for it to date.
Overview
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
In the citing paper
“Biodegradation using microbes or cell-free enzymes has been demonstrated to be technically effective for a range of contaminants, including herbicides (33), insecticides (34, 35), fungicides (36–38), and industrial solvents (39, 40).”
From Toward the development of a molecular toolkit for the microbial remediation of per-and polyfluoroalkyl substances (2024) · cites this paper as [34]
Citations
Cites
No references could be resolved yet.
Research works printed but not linked: 52
- Alcalde M., 2006, Trends Biotechnol., 24, 281, 10.1016/j.tibtech.2006.04.002 · DOI
- Gentry T. J., 2004, Crit. Rev. Environ. Sci. Technol., 34, 447, 10.1080/10643380490452362 · DOI
- Thompson I. P., 2005, Environ. Microbiol., 7, 909, 10.1111/j.1462-2920.2005.00804.x · DOI
- Singh S., 2008, Curr. Opin. Biotechnol., 19, 437, 10.1016/j.copbio.2008.07.012 · DOI
- de Lorenzo V., 2009, Clin. Microbiol. Infect., 15, 63, 10.1111/j.1469-0691.2008.02683.x · DOI
- Chauhan A., 2008, Indian J. Microbiol., 48, 95, 10.1007/s12088-008-0010-9 · DOI
- Snow A. A., 2005, Ecol. Appl., 15, 377, 10.1890/04-0539 · DOI
- Jorgensen K. S., 2007, Adv. Appl. Microbiol., 61, 285, 10.1016/S0065-2164(06)61008-3 · DOI
- Eapen S., 2007, Biotechnol. Adv., 25, 442, 10.1016/j.biotechadv.2007.05.001 · DOI
- Cherian S., 2005, Environ. Sci. Technol., 39, 9377, 10.1021/es051134l · DOI
- Akhond M. A. Y., 2009, Euphytica, 166, 47, 10.1007/s10681-008-9823-1 · DOI
- Scott C., 2008, Indian J. Microbiol., 48, 65, 10.1007/s12088-008-0007-4 · DOI
- Russell R. J., 2011, Evol. Appl., 4, 225, 10.1111/j.1752-4571.2010.00175.x · DOI · Paper page
- Russell R. J., Evol. Appl.
- Sutherland T. D., 2004, Clin. Exp. Pharmacol. Physiol., 31, 817, 10.1111/j.1440-1681.2004.04088.x · DOI
- Horne I., 2002, Appl. Environ. Microbiol., 68, 3371, 10.1128/AEM.68.7.3371-3376.2002 · DOI
- Jackson C. J., 2006, Biochem. J., 397, 501, 10.1042/BJ20060276 · DOI
- Jackson C. J., 2008, J. Mol. Biol., 375, 1189, 10.1016/j.jmb.2007.10.061 · DOI
- Caldwell S. R., 1991, Biochemistry, 30, 7438, 10.1021/bi00244a010 · DOI
- Russell R. J., 1998, Seeking Agricultural Produce Free of Pesticide Residues, 341
- Cho C. M. H., 2004, Appl. Environ. Microbiol., 70, 4681, 10.1128/AEM.70.8.4681-4685.2004 · DOI
- Lai K., 1995, Arch. Biochem. Biophys., 318, 59, 10.1006/abbi.1995.1204 · DOI
- Jackson C. J., 2009, Appl. Environ. Microbiol., 75, 5153, 10.1128/AEM.00629-09 · DOI
- Jackson C. J., 2005, Org. Biomol. Chem., 3, 4343, 10.1039/b512399b · DOI
- Efremenko E. N., 2001, Russ. Chem. Bull., 50, 1826, 10.1023/A:1014377912147 · DOI
- Briseno-Roa L., 2006, J. Med. Chem., 49, 246, 10.1021/jm050518j · DOI
- Barron M. G., 1995, Reviews of Environmental Contamination and Toxicology, 144, 1, 10.1007/978-1-4612-2550-8_1 · DOI
- Mayer F. L., 1986, Manual of Acute Toxicity: Interpretation and Database for 410 Chemicals and 66 Species of Freshwater Animals
- Russell R. J., 2001, Australas. Biotechnol., 11, 24
- Nemeth-Konda L., 2002, Chemosphere, 48, 545, 10.1016/S0045-6535(02)00106-6 · DOI
- Desouza M. L., 1995, Appl. Environ. Microbiol., 61, 3373, 10.1128/aem.61.9.3373-3378.1995 · DOI
- Topp E., 2001, Biol. Fertil. Soils, 33, 529, 10.1007/s003740100371 · DOI
- Topp E., 2004, Pesticide Decontamination and Detoxification, 863, 141, 10.1021/bk-2004-0863.ch011 · DOI
- Wackett L. P., 2002, Appl. Microbiol. Biotechnol., 58, 39, 10.1007/s00253-001-0862-y · DOI
- Strong L. C., 2000, Environ. Microbiol., 2, 91, 10.1046/j.1462-2920.2000.00079.x · DOI
- Wang L., 2005, Plant Biotechnol. J., 3, 475, 10.1111/j.1467-7652.2005.00138.x · DOI
- Scott C., 2009, Appl. Environ. Microbiol., 75, 2184, 10.1128/AEM.02634-08 · DOI
- Scott C., 2010, J. Environ. Manage., 91, 2075, 10.1016/j.jenvman.2010.05.007 · DOI
- Heidari R., 2005, Insect Biochem. Mol. Biol., 35, 597, 10.1016/j.ibmb.2005.02.018 · DOI
- Weston D. P., 2009, Environ. Sci. Technol., 43, 5514, 10.1021/es900434z · DOI
- Lal R., 2010, Microbiol. Mol. Biol. Rev., 74, 58, 10.1128/MMBR.00029-09 · DOI · Paper page
- Pandey G., 2010, Appl. Environ. Microbiol., 76, 2940, 10.1128/AEM.02990-09 · DOI · Paper page
- Cheesman M. J., 2007, Rational Environmental Management of Agrochemicals: Risk Assessment, Monitoring, and Remedial Action, 966, 288, 10.1021/bk-2007-0966.ch018 · DOI
- Naqvi T., 2009, J. Biotechnol., 144, 89, 10.1016/j.jbiotec.2009.09.009 · DOI
- Khurana J. L., 2009, Biochem. J., 418, 431, 10.1042/BJ20081488 · DOI
- Kawahigashi H., 2008, J. Mol. Microbiol. Biotechnol., 15, 212
- Scott J. G., 1999, Insect Biochem. Mol. Biol., 29, 757, 10.1016/S0965-1748(99)00038-7 · DOI
- Chakraborty S., 2005, Arch. Biochem. Biophys., 437, 20, 10.1016/j.abb.2005.02.024 · DOI
- Sutherland T. D., 2002, Appl. Environ. Microbiol., 68, 6237, 10.1128/AEM.68.12.6237-6245.2002 · DOI
- Weir K. M., 2006, Appl. Environ. Microbiol., 72, 3524, 10.1128/AEM.72.5.3524-3530.2006 · DOI
- Betancor L., 2006, Chem. Commun., 3640, 10.1039/b604689d · DOI
- Berenguer-Murcia A., 2010, Curr. Org. Chem., 14, 1000, 10.2174/138527210791130514 · DOI
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Hu, M., & Scott, C. (2024) · Applied and Environmental Microbiology · doi:10.1128/aem.00157-24 · Cited by 63
Self-citation
Metadata
- Authors
- Scott, C., Begley, C., Taylor, M. J., Pandey, G., Momiroski, V., French, N., Brearley, C., Kotsonis, S. E., Selleck, M. J., Carino, F. A., Bajet, C. M., Clarke, C., Oakeshott, J. G., & Russell, R. J.
- Affiliations
- CSIRO Ecosystem Sciences, GPO Box 1700, Canberra, Australian Capital Territory 2601, Australia
- Venue
- ACS Symposium Series
- Publisher
- American Chemical Society
- Published
- 2011-01
- Pages
- 155-174
- ISSN
- 0097-6156
- 1947-5918
- Cited by
- 22
- References
- 0
- Language
- en
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review