The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Comparison of the Fouling Release Properties of Hydrophobic Fluorinated and Hydrophilic PEGylated Block Copolymer Surfaces: Attachment Strength of the Diatom Navicula and the Green Alga Ulva
Abstract
To understand the role of surface wettability in adhesion of cells, the attachment of two different marine algae was studied on hydrophobic and hydrophilic polymer surfaces. Adhesion of cells of the diatom Navicula and sporelings (young plants) of the green macroalga Ulva to an underwater surface is mainly by interactions between the surface and the adhesive exopolymers, which the cells secrete upon settlement and during subsequent colonization and growth. Two types of block copolymers, one with poly(ethylene glycol) side-chains and the other with liquid crystalline, fluorinated side-chains, were used to prepare the hydrophilic and hydrophobic surfaces, respectively. The formation of a liquid crystalline smectic phase in the latter inhibited molecular reorganization at the surface, which is generally an issue when a highly hydrophobic surface is in contact with water. The adhesion strength was assessed by the fraction of settled cells (Navicula) or biomass (Ulva) that detached from the surface in a water flow channel with a wall shear stress of 53 Pa. The two species exhibited opposite adhesion behavior on the same sets of surfaces. While Navicula cells released more easily from hydrophilic surfaces, Ulva sporelings showed higher removal from hydrophobic surfaces. This highlights the importance of differences in cell-surface interactions in determining the strength of adhesion of cells to substrates.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Antifouling membranes for sustainable water purification: strategies and mechanisms
Zhang, R., Liu, Y., He, M., Su, Y., Zhao, X., Elimelech, M., & Jiang, Z. (2016) · Chemical Society Reviews · doi:10.1039/c5cs00579e · Cited by 1,365
Trends in the development of environmentally friendly fouling-resistant marine coatings
Callow, J. A., & Callow, M. E. (2011) · Nature Communications · doi:10.1038/ncomms1251 · Cited by 1,288
Self-citationKong, H., & Jang, J. (2008) · Langmuir · doi:10.1021/la703085e · Cited by 526
Ordering in thin films of block copolymers: Fundamentals to potential applications
Hamley, I. W. (2009) · Progress in Polymer Science · doi:10.1016/j.progpolymsci.2009.06.003 · Cited by 521
The biology of biofouling diatoms and their role in the development of microbial slimes
Molino, P. J., & Wetherbee, R. (2008) · Biofouling · doi:10.1080/08927010802254583 · Cited by 307
Metadata
- Authors
- Krishnan, S., Wang, N., Ober, C. K., Finlay, J. A., Callow, M. E., Callow, J. A., Hexemer, A., Sohn, K. E., Kramer, E. J., & Fischer, D. A.
- Venue
- Biomacromolecules
- Publisher
- American Chemical Society (ACS)
- Published
- 2006-04-14
- Volume
- 7
- Issue
- 5
- Pages
- 1449-1462
- ISSN
- 1525-7797 (ISSN-L)
- 1526-4602
- OpenAlex
- W2072465534
- Cited by
- 283
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 36.26
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Comparison of the Fouling Release Properties of Hydrophobic Fluorinated and Hydrophilic PEGylated Block Copolymer Surfaces: Attachment Strength of the Diatom Navicula and the Green Alga Ulva. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1021/bm0509826
- The paper
- Krishnan, S., Wang, N., Ober, C. K., Finlay, J. A., Callow, M. E., Callow, J. A., Hexemer, A., Sohn, K. E., Kramer, E. J., & Fischer, D. A. (2006). Comparison of the Fouling Release Properties of Hydrophobic Fluorinated and Hydrophilic PEGylated Block Copolymer Surfaces: Attachment Strength of the Diatom Navicula and the Green Alga Ulva. Biomacromolecules. https://doi.org/10.1021/bm0509826
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.