The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
The Future Prospects of Microbial Cellulose in Biomedical Applications
Abstract
Microbial cellulose has proven to be a remarkably versatile biomaterial and can be used in wide variety of applied scientific endeavors, such as paper products, electronics, acoustics, and biomedical devices. In fact, biomedical devices recently have gained a significant amount of attention because of an increased interest in tissue-engineered products for both wound care and the regeneration of damaged or diseased organs. Due to its unique nanostructure and properties, microbial cellulose is a natural candidate for numerous medical and tissue-engineered applications. For example, a microbial cellulose membrane has been successfully used as a wound-healing device for severely damaged skin and as a small-diameter blood vessel replacement. The nonwoven ribbons of microbial cellulose microfibrils closely resemble the structure of native extracellular matrices, suggesting that it could function as a scaffold for the production of many tissue-engineered constructs. In addition, microbial cellulose membranes, having a unique nanostructure, could have many other uses in wound healing and regenerative medicine, such as guided tissue regeneration (GTR), periodontal treatments, or as a replacement for dura mater (a membrane that surrounds brain tissue). In effect, microbial cellulose could function as a scaffold material for the regeneration of a wide variety of tissues, showing that it could eventually become an excellent platform technology for medicine. If microbial cellulose can be successfully mass produced, it will eventually become a vital biomaterial and will be used in the creation of a wide variety of medical devices and consumer products.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Hydrogels for tissue engineering: scaffold design variables and applications
Drury, J. L., & Mooney, D. J. (2003) · Biomaterials · doi:10.1016/s0142-9612(03)00340-5 · Cited by 5,136
Cited by
Developing fibrillated cellulose as a sustainable technological material
Li, T., Chen, C., Brozena, A. H., Zhu, J. Y., Xu, L., Driemeier, C., Dai, J., Rojas, O. J., Isogai, A., Wågberg, L., et al. (2021) · Nature · doi:10.1038/s41586-020-03167-7 · Cited by 1,674
Ionic Liquids and Their Interaction with Cellulose
Pinkert, A., Marsh, K. N., Pang, S., & Staiger, M. P. (2009) · Chemical Reviews · doi:10.1021/cr9001947 · Cited by 1,508
Natural and synthetic polymers for wounds and burns dressing
Mogoşanu, G. D., & Grumezescu, A. M. (2014) · International Journal of Pharmaceutics · doi:10.1016/j.ijpharm.2013.12.015 · Cited by 1,052
Cellulosic nanocomposites: a review
(2008) · BioResources · doi:10.15376/biores.3.3.929-980 · Cited by 901
Cellulose-based hydrogel materials: chemistry, properties and their prospective applications
Kabir, S. M. F., Sikdar, P. P., Haque, B., Bhuiyan, M. A. R., Ali, A., & Islam, M. N. (2018) · Progress in Biomaterials · doi:10.1007/s40204-018-0095-0 · Cited by 565
Metadata
- Authors
- Czaja, W. K., Young, D. J., Kawecki, M., & Brown, R. M.
- Venue
- Biomacromolecules
- Publisher
- American Chemical Society (ACS)
- Published
- 2006-12-01
- Volume
- 8
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 1-12
- ISSN
- 1525-7797 (ISSN-L)
- 1526-4602
- OpenAlex
- W1987281985
- Cited by
- 1,182
- References
- 1
- FWCI
- 9.43
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: The Future Prospects of Microbial Cellulose in Biomedical Applications. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1021/bm060620d
- The paper
- Czaja, W. K., Young, D. J., Kawecki, M., & Brown, R. M. (2007). The Future Prospects of Microbial Cellulose in Biomedical Applications. Biomacromolecules. https://doi.org/10.1021/bm060620d
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.