The DOI matches its Crossref record; 3 of the 3 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Biomimetic Polysaccharide Nanocomposites of High Cellulose Content and High Toughness
Abstract
Plant cell walls combine mechanical stiffness, strength and toughness despite a highly hydrated state. Inspired by this, a nanostructured cellulose network is combined with an almost viscous polysaccharide matrix in the form of a 50/50 amylopectin-glycerol blend. Homogeneous films with a microfibrillated cellulose (MFC) nanofiber content in the range of 10-70 wt % are successfully cast. Characterization is carried out by dynamic mechanical analysis, field-emission scanning electron microscopy, X-ray diffraction, and mercury density measurements. The MFC is well dispersed and predominantly oriented random-in-the-plane. High tensile strength is combined with high modulus and very high work of fracture in the nanocomposite with 70 wt % MFC. The reasons for this interesting combination of properties include nanofiber and matrix properties, favorable nanofiber-matrix interaction, good dispersion, and the ability of the MFC network to maintain its integrity to a strain of at least 8%.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Polymer nanocomposites reinforced by cellulose whiskers
Favier, V., Chanzy, H., & Cavaille, J. Y. (1995) · Macromolecules · doi:10.1021/ma00122a053 · Cited by 1,149
Experimental determination of the elastic modulus of crystalline regions in oriented polymers
Sakurada, I., Nukushina, Y., & Ito, T. (1962) · Journal of Polymer Science · doi:10.1002/pol.1962.1205716551 · Cited by 883
Plasticized starch/tunicin whiskers nanocomposites. 1. Structural analysis
Anglès, M. N., & Dufresne, A. (2000) · Macromolecules · doi:10.1021/ma0008701 · Cited by 667
Cited by
Cellulose nanomaterials review: structure, properties and nanocomposites
Moon, R. J., Martini, A., Nairn, J., Simonsen, J., & Youngblood, J. (2011) · Chemical Society Reviews · doi:10.1039/c0cs00108b · Cited by 6,756
Ionic Liquids and Their Interaction with Cellulose
Pinkert, A., Marsh, K. N., Pang, S., & Staiger, M. P. (2009) · Chemical Reviews · doi:10.1021/cr9001947 · Cited by 1,508
Current characterization methods for cellulose nanomaterials
Foster, E. J., Moon, R. J., Agarwal, U. P., Bortner, M. J., Bras, J., Camarero-Espinosa, S., Chan, K. J., Clift, M. J. D., Cranston, E. D., Eichhorn, S. J., et al. (2018) · Chemical Society Reviews · doi:10.1039/c6cs00895j · Cited by 1,021
Cellulosic nanocomposites: a review
(2008) · BioResources · doi:10.15376/biores.3.3.929-980 · Cited by 901
On the use of nanocellulose as reinforcement in polymer matrix composites
Lee, K.-Y., Aitomäki, Y., Berglund, L. A., Oksman, K., & Bismarck, A. (2014) · Composites Science and Technology · doi:10.1016/j.compscitech.2014.08.032 · Cited by 819
Self-citation
Metadata
- Authors
- Svagan, A. J., Azizi Samir, M. A. S., & Berglund, L. A.
- Venue
- Biomacromolecules
- Publisher
- American Chemical Society (ACS)
- Published
- 2007-07-27
- Volume
- 8
- Issue
- 8
- Pages
- 2556-2563
- ISSN
- 1525-7797 (ISSN-L)
- 1526-4602
- OpenAlex
- W2034203502
- Cited by
- 315
- References
- 3
- FWCI
- 5.62
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Biomimetic Polysaccharide Nanocomposites of High Cellulose Content and High Toughness. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1021/bm0703160
- The paper
- Svagan, A. J., Azizi Samir, M. A. S., & Berglund, L. A. (2007). Biomimetic Polysaccharide Nanocomposites of High Cellulose Content and High Toughness. Biomacromolecules. https://doi.org/10.1021/bm0703160
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.