The DOI matches its Crossref record; 5 of the 5 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Effect of Moisture on Electrospun Nanofiber Composites of Poly(vinyl alcohol) and Cellulose Nanocrystals
Abstract
The effect of humidity on the morphological and thermomechanical properties of electrospun poly(vinyl alcohol) (PVA) fiber mats reinforced with cellulose nanocrystals (CNs) was investigated. Scanning electron microscopy (SEM) images revealed that the incorporation of CNs improved the morphological stability of the composite fibers even in high humidity environments. Thermal and mechanical properties of the electrospun fiber mats were studied by using differential scanning calorimetry (DSC), dynamic mechanical analysis (DMA), and large deformation tensile tests under controlled humidity and temperatures. The balance between the moisture-induced plasticization and the reinforcing effect of rigid CN particles was critical in determining the thermomechanical behaviors of the electrospun fiber mats. Results indicated that the stabilizing effect of the CNs in the PVA matrix might be compromised by water absorption, disrupting the hydrogen bonding within the structure. The amount of this disruption depended on the surrounding humidity and the CN loading. The reduction in tensile strength of neat PVA fiber mats as they were conditioned from low relative humidity (10% RH) to high relative humidity (70% RH) was found to be about 80%, from 1.5 to 0.4 MPa. When the structure was reinforced with CNs, the reduction in strength was limited to 40%, from 2 to 0.8 MPa over the same range in relative humidity. More importantly, the CN-loaded PVA fiber mats showed a reversible recovery in mechanical strength after cycling the relative humidity. Finally, humidity treatments of the composite PVA fiber mats induced significant enhancement of their strength as a result of the adhesion between the continuous matrix and the CNs.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Cellulose nanocrystals: chemistry, self-assembly, and applications
Habibi, Y., Lucia, L. A., & Rojas, O. J. (2010) · Chemical Reviews · doi:10.1021/cr900339w · Cited by 5,980
Self-citationPolymer nanocomposites reinforced by cellulose whiskers
Favier, V., Chanzy, H., & Cavaille, J. Y. (1995) · Macromolecules · doi:10.1021/ma00122a053 · Cited by 1,149
Morphological investigation of nanocomposites from sorbitol plasticized starch and tunicin whiskers
Mathew, A. P., & Dufresne, A. (2002) · Biomacromolecules · doi:10.1021/bm0101769 · Cited by 384
Biocomposites of plasticized starch reinforced with cellulose crystallites from cottonseed linter
Lu, Y., Weng, L., & Cao, X. (2005) · Macromolecular Bioscience · doi:10.1002/mabi.200500094 · Cited by 200
Electrospun nanocomposites from polystyrene loaded with cellulose nanowhiskers
Rojas, O. J., Montero, G. A., & Habibi, Y. (2009) · Journal of Applied Polymer Science · doi:10.1002/app.30011 · Cited by 198
Self-citation
Cited by
Production of nanocrystalline cellulose from lignocellulosic biomass: Technology and applications
Brinchi, L., Cotana, F., Fortunati, E., & Kenny, J. M. (2013) · Carbohydrate Polymers · doi:10.1016/j.carbpol.2013.01.033 · Cited by 1,121
Nanocellulose in packaging: Advances in barrier layer technologies
Ferrer, A., Pal, L., & Hubbe, M. (2017) · Industrial Crops and Products · doi:10.1016/j.indcrop.2016.11.012 · Cited by 382
Abdul Khalil, H. P. S., Davoudpour, Y., Saurabh, C. K., Hossain, M. S., Adnan, A. S., Dungani, R., Paridah, M. T., Islam Sarker, M. Z., Fazita, M. R. N., Syakir, M. I., et al. (2016) · Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews · doi:10.1016/j.rser.2016.06.072 · Cited by 306
Yang, J., Han, C.-R., Duan, J.-F., Xu, F., & Sun, R.-C. (2013) · ACS Applied Materials & Interfaces · doi:10.1021/am4001997 · Cited by 261
Metadata
- Authors
- Peresin, M. S., Habibi, Y., Vesterinen, A.-H., Rojas, O. J., Pawlak, J. J., & Seppälä, J. V.
- Venue
- Biomacromolecules
- Publisher
- American Chemical Society (ACS)
- Published
- 2010-07-27
- Volume
- 11
- Issue
- 9
- Pages
- 2471-2477
- ISSN
- 1525-7797 (ISSN-L)
- 1526-4602
- OpenAlex
- W2125464959
- Cited by
- 160
- References
- 5
- FWCI
- 3.66
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.