The DOI matches its Crossref record; 2 of the 2 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Cross-Linking and Degradation of Step-Growth Hydrogels Formed by Thiol–Ene Photoclick Chemistry
Open accessAbstract
Thiol-ene photoclick hydrogels have been used for a variety of tissue engineering and controlled release applications. In this step-growth photopolymerization scheme, four-arm poly(ethylene glycol) norbornene (PEG4NB) was cross-linked with dithiol containing cross-linkers to form chemically cross-linked hydrogels. While the mechanism of thiol-ene gelation was well described in the literature, its network ideality and degradation behaviors are not well-characterized. Here, we compared the network cross-linking of thiol-ene hydrogels to Michael-type addition hydrogels and found thiol-ene hydrogels formed with faster gel points and higher degree of cross-linking. However, thiol-ene hydrogels still contained significant network nonideality, demonstrated by a high dependency of hydrogel swelling on macromer contents. In addition, the presence of ester bonds within the PEG-norbornene macromer rendered thiol-ene hydrogels hydrolytically degradable. Through validating model predictions with experimental results, we found that the hydrolytic degradation of thiol-ene hydrogels was not only governed by ester bond hydrolysis, but also affected by the degree of network cross-linking. In an attempt to manipulate network cross-linking and degradation of thiol-ene hydrogels, we incorporated peptide cross-linkers with different sequences and characterized the hydrolytic degradation of these PEG-peptide hydrogels. In addition, we incorporated a chymotrypsin-sensitive peptide as part of the cross-linkers to tune the mode of gel degradation from bulk degradation to surface erosion.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Hydrogels in Biology and Medicine: From Molecular Principles to Bionanotechnology
Peppas, N. A., Hilt, J. Z., Khademhosseini, A., & Langer, R. (2006) · Advanced Materials · doi:10.1002/adma.200501612 · Cited by 4,109
Bryant, S. J., & Anseth, K. S. (2002) · Journal of Biomedical Materials Research · doi:10.1002/jbm.1217 · Cited by 845
Cited by
Designing degradable hydrogels for orthogonal control of cell microenvironments
Kharkar, P. M., Kiick, K. L., & Kloxin, A. M. (2013) · Chem. Soc. Rev. · doi:10.1039/c3cs60040h · Cited by 717
3D biofabrication strategies for tissue engineering and regenerative medicine
Bajaj, P., Schweller, R. M., Khademhosseini, A., West, J. L., & Bashir, R. (2014) · Annual Review of Biomedical Engineering · doi:10.1146/annurev-bioeng-071813-105155 · Cited by 632
Toughening of photo-curable polymer networks: a review
Ligon-Auer, S. C., Schwentenwein, M., Gorsche, C., Stampfl, J., & Liska, R. (2016) · Polymer Chemistry · doi:10.1039/c5py01631b · Cited by 447
An overview of injectable polymeric hydrogels for tissue engineering
Sivashanmugam, A., Arun Kumar, R., Vishnu Priya, M., Nair, S. V., & Jayakumar, R. (2015) · European Polymer Journal · doi:10.1016/j.eurpolymj.2015.05.014 · Cited by 366
Gramlich, W. M., Kim, I. L., & Burdick, J. A. (2013) · Biomaterials · doi:10.1016/j.biomaterials.2013.08.089 · Cited by 337
Metadata
- Authors
- Shih, H., & Lin, C.-C.
- Venue
- Biomacromolecules
- Publisher
- American Chemical Society (ACS)
- Published
- 2012-06-22
- Volume
- 13
- Issue
- 7
- Pages
- 2003-2012
- ISSN
- 1525-7797 (ISSN-L)
- 1526-4602
- OpenAlex
- W2005310275
- Cited by
- 256
- References
- 2
- FWCI
- 7.85
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.