The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Influence of Enzyme Loading and Physical Parameters on the Enzymatic Hydrolysis of Steam-Pretreated Softwood
Abstract
Softwood is an interesting raw material for the production of fuel ethanol as a result of its high content of hexoses, and it has attracted attention especially in the Northern hemisphere. However, the enzymatic hydrolysis of softwood is not sufficiently efficient for the complete conversion of cellulose to glucose. Since an improvement in the glucose yield is of great importance for the overall economy of the process, the influence of various parameters on the cellulose conversion of steam-pretreated spruce has been investigated. The addition of beta-glucosidase up to 50 IU g(-)(1) cellulose to the enzymatic hydrolysis process resulted in increased cellulose conversion at a cellulase loading up to 48 FPU g(-)(1) cellulose. Despite very high enzyme loading (120 FPU g(-)(1) cellulose) only about 50% of the cellulose in steam-pretreated spruce was converted to glucose when all of the material following pretreatment was used in the hydrolysis step. The influence of temperature, residence time, and pH were investigated for washed pretreated spruce at a dry matter (DM) content of 5% and a cellulase activity of 18.5 FPU g(-)(1) cellulose. The optimal temperature was found to be dependent on both residence time and pH, and the maximum degree of cellulose conversion, 69.2%, was obtained at 38 degrees C and pH 4.9 for a residence time of 144 h. However, when the substrate concentration was changed from 5% to 2% DM, the cellulose conversion increased to 79.7%. An increase from 5% to 10% DM resulted, however, in a similar degree of cellulose conversion, despite a significant increase in the glucose concentration from 23 g L(-)(1) to 45 g L(-)(1). The deactivation of beta-glucosidase increased with increasing residence time and was more pronounced with vigorous agitation.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Trends in biotechnological production of fuel ethanol from different feedstocks
Sánchez, Ó. J., & Cardona, C. A. (2008) · Bioresource Technology · doi:10.1016/j.biortech.2007.11.013 · Cited by 1,826
Bio-ethanol – the fuel of tomorrow from the residues of today
Hahn-Hägerdal, B., Galbe, M., Gorwa-Grauslund, M. F., Lidén, G., & Zacchi, G. (2006) · Trends in Biotechnology · doi:10.1016/j.tibtech.2006.10.004 · Cited by 1,513
Self-citationA review of the production of ethanol from softwood
Galbe, M., & Zacchi, G. (2002) · Applied Microbiology and Biotechnology · doi:10.1007/s00253-002-1058-9 · Cited by 1,109
Self-citationAcid-based hydrolysis processes for ethanol from lignocellulosic materials: A review
Taherzadeh, M. J., & Karimi, K. (2007) · BioResources · doi:10.15376/biores.2.3.472-499 · Cited by 1,013
Mechanism of surfactant effect in enzymatic hydrolysis of lignocellulose
Eriksson, T., Börjesson, J., & Tjerneld, F. (2002) · Enzyme and Microbial Technology · doi:10.1016/s0141-0229(02)00134-5 · Cited by 891
Metadata
- Authors
- Tengborg, C., Galbe, M., & Zacchi, G.
- Venue
- Biotechnology Progress
- Publisher
- American Chemical Society (ACS)
- Published
- 2001-02-02
- Volume
- 17
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 110-117
- ISSN
- 1520-6033 (ISSN-L)
- 8756-7938
- OpenAlex
- W2094139824
- Cited by
- 238
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 5.24
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Influence of Enzyme Loading and Physical Parameters on the Enzymatic Hydrolysis of Steam-Pretreated Softwood. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1021/bp000145+
- The paper
- Tengborg, C., Galbe, M., & Zacchi, G. (2001). Influence of Enzyme Loading and Physical Parameters on the Enzymatic Hydrolysis of Steam-Pretreated Softwood. Biotechnology Progress. https://doi.org/10.1021/bp000145%2B
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.