The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Detoxification of Dilute Acid Hydrolysates of Lignocellulose with Lime
Abstract
The hydrolysis of hemicellulose to monomeric sugars by dilute acid hydrolysis is accompanied by the production of inhibitors that retard microbial fermentation. Treatment of hot hydrolysate with Ca(OH)2 (overliming) is an effective method for detoxification. Using ethanologenic Escherichia coli LY01 as the biocatalyst, our results indicate that the optimal lime addition for detoxification varies and depends on the concentration of mineral acids and organic acids in each hydrolysate. This optimum was shown to be readily predicted on the basis of the titration of hydrolysate with 2 N NaOH at ambient temperature to either pH 7.0 or pH 11.0. The average composition of 15 hydrolysates prior to treatment was as follows (per L): 95.24 ± 7.29 g sugar, 5.3 ± 2.99 g acetic acid, 1.305 ± 0.288 g total furans (furfural and hydroxymethylfurfural), and 2.86 ± 0.34 g phenolic compounds. Optimal overliming resulted in a 51 ± 9% reduction of total furans, a 41 ± 6% reduction in phenolic compounds, and a 8.7 ± 4.5% decline in sugar. Acetic acid levels were unchanged. Considering the similarity of microorganisms, it is possible that the titration method described here may also prove useful for detoxification and fermentation processes using other microbial biocatalysts.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Fermentation of lignocellulosic hydrolysates for ethanol production
Olsson, L., & Hahn-Hägerdal, B. (1996) · Enzyme and Microbial Technology · doi:10.1016/0141-0229(95)00157-3 · Cited by 783
Cited by
Trends in biotechnological production of fuel ethanol from different feedstocks
Sánchez, Ó. J., & Cardona, C. A. (2008) · Bioresource Technology · doi:10.1016/j.biortech.2007.11.013 · Cited by 1,826
Bioconversion of lignocellulose: inhibitors and detoxification
Jönsson, L. J., Alriksson, B., & Nilvebrant, N.-O. (2013) · Biotechnology for Biofuels · doi:10.1186/1754-6834-6-16 · Cited by 1,382
Ethanol production from biomass: technology and commercialization status
Mielenz, J. R. (2001) · Current Opinion in Microbiology · doi:10.1016/s1369-5274(00)00211-3 · Cited by 440
Martínez-Ruano, J. A., Caballero-Galván, A. S., Restrepo-Serna, D. L., & Cardona, C. A. (2018) · Environmental Science and Pollution Research · doi:10.1007/s11356-018-1848-y · Cited by 53
Metadata
- Authors
- Martinez, A., Rodriguez, M. E., Wells, M. L., York, S. W., Preston, J. F., & Ingram, L. O.
- Venue
- Biotechnology Progress
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 2001-01
- Volume
- 17
- Issue
- 2
- Pages
- 287-293
- ISSN
- 1520-6033 (ISSN-L)
- 8756-7938
- OpenAlex
- W1579875904
- Cited by
- 352
- References
- 1
- FWCI
- 7.70
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.