The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Biosorption of Lead, Cadmium, and Zinc by Citrobacter Strain MCM B-181: Characterization Studies
Abstract
The biosorption process for removal of lead, cadmium, and zinc by Citrobacter strain MCM B-181, a laboratory isolate, was characterized. Effects of environmental factors and growth conditions on metal uptake capacity were studied. Pretreatment of biomass with chemical agents increased cadmium sorption efficiency; however, there was no significant enhancement in lead and zinc sorption capacity. Metal sorption by Citrobacter strain MCM B-181 was found to be influenced by the pH of the solution, initial metal concentration, biomass concentration, and type of growth medium. The metal sorption process was not affected by the age of the culture or change in temperature. Equilibrium metal sorption was found to fit the Langmuir adsorption model. Kinetic studies showed that metal uptake by Citrobacter strain MCM B-181 was a fast process, requiring <20 min to achieve >90% adsorption efficiency. The presence of cations reduced lead, zinc, and cadmium sorption to the extent of 11. 8%, 84.3%, and 33.4%, respectively. When biomass was exposed to multimetal solutions, metals were adsorbed in the order Co2+ < Ni2+ < Cd2+ < Cu2+ < Zn2+ < Pb2+. Among various anions tested, only phosphate and citrate were found to hamper metal sorption capacity of cells. Biosorbent beads prepared by immobilizing the Citrobacter biomass in polysulfone matrix exhibited high metal loading capacities. A new mathematical model used for batch kinetic studies was found to be highly useful in prediction of experimentally obtained metal concentration profiles as a function of time. Metal desorption studies indicated that Citrobacter beads could, in principle, be regenerated and reused in adsorption-desorption cycles. In an expanded scale trial, biosorbent beads were found to be useful in removal/recovery of metals such as lead from industrial wastewaters.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
The adsorption of gases on plane surfaces of glass, mica and platinum
Langmuir, I. (1918) · Journal of the American Chemical Society · doi:10.1021/ja02242a004 · Cited by 23,242
Cited by
Priyadarshanee, M., & Das, S. (2021) · Journal of Environmental Chemical Engineering · doi:10.1016/j.jece.2020.104686 · Cited by 445
Comparative studies on the microbial adsorption of heavy metals
Goyal, N., Jain, S. C., & Banerjee, U. C. (2003) · Advances in Environmental Research · doi:10.1016/s1093-0191(02)00004-7 · Cited by 408
Biosorption of copper(II) and cobalt(II) from aqueous solutions by crab shell particles
Vijayaraghavan, K., Palanivelu, K., & Velan, M. (2006) · Bioresource Technology · doi:10.1016/j.biortech.2005.07.001 · Cited by 347
Metadata
- Authors
- Puranik, P. R., & Paknikar, K. M.
- Venue
- Biotechnology Progress
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 1999-04-05
- Volume
- 15
- Issue
- 2
- Pages
- 228-237
- ISSN
- 1520-6033 (ISSN-L)
- 8756-7938
- OpenAlex
- W2041346397
- Cited by
- 280
- References
- 1
- FWCI
- 9.35
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.