50 years of HPLC
Abstract
For some chromatographers, their first inkling that high-performance liquid chromatography was going to be a big deal came in 1969. That year, they traveled to Las Vegas to attend the fifth in a series of meetings organized by University of Houston chemist Albert Zlatkis. Earlier meetings in the “Advances in Chromatography” series had focused on gas chromatography, which separates volatile compounds in a mixture as it passes through a gas-filled column. So, many of the attendees at that meeting in 1969 were GC experts who hadn’t heard much about the technique that was to become HPLC. They were in for an awakening. “That meeting was pivotal in terms of really giving a jump start to HPLC,” says Ronald Majors, who was in attendance. After hearing about the still-nascent technique, “everybody got really excited.” GC was still the dominant separation technology at the time. But GC had its drawbacks. Most important,
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Only about 1% of fresh water is added to pools to offset daily water consumption via evaporation and other losses, and therefore the retention time of swimming pool waters reaches as high as 100 days.
“A study shows that only about 1% of fresh water is added to the pools to offset the daily water consumption via evaporation and other losses, and therefore the retention time of SPWs reaches as high as 100 days (Arnaud, 2016).”
From Regulation, formation, exposure, and treatment of disinfection by-products (DBPs) in swimming pool waters: A critical review (2018) · cites this paper as Arnaud, 2016
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Fell, J. B., Fischer, J. P., Baer, B. R., Blake, J. F., Bouhana, K., Briere, D. M., Brown, K. D., Burgess, L. E., Burns, A. C., Burkard, M. R., et al. (2020) · Journal of Medicinal Chemistry · doi:10.1021/acs.jmedchem.9b02052 · Cited by 653 · see citing works
Targeting KRAS in non-small-cell lung cancer: recent progress and new approaches
Reck, M., Carbone, D. P., Garassino, M., & Barlesi, F. (2021) · Annals of Oncology · doi:10.1016/j.annonc.2021.06.001 · Cited by 326 · see citing works
Yang, L., Chen, X., She, Q., Cao, G., Liu, Y., Chang, V. W.-C., & Tang, C. Y. (2018) · Environment International · doi:10.1016/j.envint.2018.10.024 · Cited by 144 · see citing works
- Authors
- Celia Henry Arnaud
- Affiliations
- C&EN Washington
- Venue
- C&EN Global Enterprise
- Publisher
- American Chemical Society (ACS)
- Published
- 2016-06-13
- Volume
- 94
- Issue
- 24
- Pages
- 28-33
- ISSN
- 2474-7408 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2611666059
- Cited by
- 70
- References
- 0
- Citations by year
- 2025: 2 · 2023: 1 · 2022: 1 · 2021: 5 · 2020: 7 · 2019: 7 · 2018: 33 · 2017: 11 · 2016: 3
- FWCI
- 8.10
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- C&EN Global Enterprise (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Physical Sciences › Chemistry › Analytical Chemistry › Analytical Chemistry and Chromatography
- Social Sciences › Arts and Humanities › History and Philosophy of Science › History of Science and Medicine
- Social Sciences › Arts and Humanities › History and Philosophy of Science › Historical Studies and Socio-cultural Analysis
- Keywords
- HPLC, gas chromatography, separation processes
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review