Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 251

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Magnetic Monodisperse Fe3O4 Nanoparticles

Si, Shufeng, Li, Chunhui, Wang, Xun, Yu, Dapeng, Peng, Qing, Li, Yadong·2005·Crystal Growth & Design

Abstract

A facile chemical approach to producing monodisperse Fe 3 O 4 nanoparticles is developed in the presence of oleic acid and laurylamine solution. These particles capped with organic ligands could be readily dispersed in nonpolar hexane. Transmission electron microscopy observations indicated that the as-synthesized nanoparticles were single crystals. The solvethermal temperature and consequent aging time are demonstrated to be critical for size distribution.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1021/cg0497905

Cites

1 of 1 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Cited by

See all 251

Metadata

Authors
Si, S., Li, C., Wang, X., Yu, D., Peng, Q., & Li, Y.
Venue
Crystal Growth & Design
Published
2005-01-07
Volume
5
Issue
2
Pages
391-393
ISSN
  • 1528-7483 (ISSN-L)
  • 1528-7505
OpenAlex
W2317877821
Cited by
251
References
1
FWCI
9.67
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.