The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Dense Liquid Precursor for the Nucleation of Ordered Solid Phases from Solution
Abstract
A line of recent theories and simulations have suggested that the nucleation of protein crystals might, under certain conditions, proceed in two steps: the formation of a droplet of a dense liquid, metastable with respect to the crystalline state, followed by ordering within this droplet to produce a crystal. In this review, I discuss experimental tests of the applicability of this mechanism to the nucleation of ordered solid phases: crystals or linear, planar, branched, or otherwise ordered aggregates of proteins and small molecule materials from solution. The main arguments stem from recent results on the kinetics of homogeneous nucleation of crystals of the protein lysozyme. These results indicate that under a very broad range of conditions the nucleation of lysozyme crystals occurs via a modification of the theoretically postulated mechanism as a superposition of fluctuations along the order parameters density and structure. Depending on whether the system is above or below its liquid−liquid coexistence line, a density fluctuation may never or may selectively lead to the formation of a dense liquid droplet; in the former case, the high-density region, the “quasi-droplet”, is metastable also with respect to the dilute solution. In both cases, the molecules contained in the high-density region may attain an ordered arrangement, i.e., a structure fluctuation is superimposed on the density fluctuation and a crystalline nucleus is obtained. This outlook on the nucleation of ordered solids from dilute phases suggests that the rate of nucleation can be controlled either by shifting the phase region of the dense liquid phase, or by facilitating the structure fluctuations within a dense liquid droplet or quasi-droplet. Results from the literature indicate that the proposed two-step nucleation mechanism and the related tools for nucleation control may be applicable to the formation of crystalline and noncrystalline ordered solid phases of other, protein and nonprotein materials, from solution.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Gower, L. B. (2008) · Chemical Reviews · doi:10.1021/cr800443h · Cited by 1,086
A Review of Classical and Nonclassical Nucleation Theories
Karthika, S., Radhakrishnan, T. K., & Kalaichelvi, P. (2016) · Crystal Growth & Design · doi:10.1021/acs.cgd.6b00794 · Cited by 868
Prenucleation clusters and non-classical nucleation
Gebauer, D., & Cölfen, H. (2011) · Nano Today · doi:10.1016/j.nantod.2011.10.005 · Cited by 682
Direct Observation of Interactions between Nanoparticles and Nanoparticle Self-Assembly in Solution
Tan, S. F., Chee, S. W., Lin, G., & Mirsaidov, U. (2017) · Accounts of Chemical Research · doi:10.1021/acs.accounts.7b00063 · Cited by 133
Metadata
- Authors
- Vekilov, P. G.
- Venue
- Crystal Growth & Design
- Publisher
- American Chemical Society (ACS)
- Published
- 2004-06-04
- Volume
- 4
- Issue
- 4
- Pages
- 671-685
- ISSN
- 1528-7483 (ISSN-L)
- 1528-7505
- OpenAlex
- W1973438039
- Cited by
- 502
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 8.33
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Dense Liquid Precursor for the Nucleation of Ordered Solid Phases from Solution. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1021/cg049977w
- The paper
- Vekilov, P. G. (2004). Dense Liquid Precursor for the Nucleation of Ordered Solid Phases from Solution. Crystal Growth & Design. https://doi.org/10.1021/cg049977w
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.