The DOI matches its Crossref record; 2 of the 2 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Nucleation
Open accessAbstract
Crystallization starts with nucleation and control of nucleation is crucial for the control of the number, size, perfection, polymorphism and other characteristics of crystalline materials. This is particularly true for crystallization in solution, which is an essential part of processes in the chemical and pharmaceutical industries and a major step in physiological and pathological phenomena. There have been significant recent advances in the understanding of the mechanism of nucleation of crystals in solution. The foremost of these are the two-step mechanism of nucleation and the notion of the solution-crystal spinodal. According to the two-step mechanism, the crystalline nucleus appears inside pre-existing metastable clusters of size several hundred nanometers, which consist of dense liquid and are suspended in the solution. While initially proposed for protein crystals, the applicability of this mechanism has been demonstrated for small molecule organic materials, colloids, polymers, and biominerals. This mechanism helps to explain several long-standing puzzles of crystal nucleation in solution: nucleation rates which are many orders of magnitude lower than theoretical predictions, the significance of the dense protein liquid, and others. At high supersaturations typical of most crystallizing systems, the generation of crystal embryos occurs in the spinodal regime, where the nucleation barrier is negligible. The solution-crystal spinodal helps to understand the role of heterogeneous substrates in nucleation and the selection of crystalline polymorphs. Importantly, these ideas provide powerful tools for control of the nucleation process by varying the solution thermodynamic parameters.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Gower, L. B. (2008) · Chemical Reviews · doi:10.1021/cr800443h · Cited by 1,086
Langer, J. S. (1975) · Fluctuations, Instabilities, and Phase Transitions · doi:10.1007/978-1-4615-8912-9_2 · Cited by 34
Cited by
Gower, L. B. (2008) · Chemical Reviews · doi:10.1021/cr800443h · Cited by 1,086
Pre-nucleation clusters as solute precursors in crystallisation
Gebauer, D., Kellermeier, M., Gale, J. D., Bergström, L., & Cölfen, H. (2014) · Chem. Soc. Rev. · doi:10.1039/c3cs60451a · Cited by 1,015
Habraken, W. J. E. M., Tao, J., Brylka, L. J., Friedrich, H., Bertinetti, L., Schenk, A. S., Verch, A., Dmitrovic, V., Bomans, P. H. H., Frederik, P. M., et al. (2013) · Nature Communications · doi:10.1038/ncomms2490 · Cited by 821
Nucleation of Organic Crystals—A Molecular Perspective
Davey, R. J., Schroeder, S. L. M., & ter Horst, J. H. (2013) · Angewandte Chemie International Edition · doi:10.1002/anie.201204824 · Cited by 567
Observing crystal nucleation in four dimensions using atomic electron tomography
Zhou, J., Yang, Y., Yang, Y., Kim, D. S., Yuan, A., Tian, X., Ophus, C., Sun, F., Schmid, A. K., Nathanson, M., et al. (2019) · Nature · doi:10.1038/s41586-019-1317-x · Cited by 336
Metadata
- Authors
- Vekilov, P. G.
- Venue
- Crystal Growth & Design
- Publisher
- American Chemical Society (ACS)
- Published
- 2010-11-15
- Volume
- 10
- Issue
- 12
- Pages
- 5007-5019
- ISSN
- 1528-7483 (ISSN-L)
- 1528-7505
- OpenAlex
- W4213379039
- Cited by
- 736
- References
- 2
- FWCI
- 16.22
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.