The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Estimation of aqueous solubility of organic molecules by the group contribution approach. Application to the study of biodegradation
Abstract
A reliable and generally applicable aqueous solubility estimation method for organic compounds based on a group contribution approach has been developed. Two models have been established based on two different sets of parameters. One has a higher accuracy, while the other has a more general applicability. The prediction potentials of these two models have been evaluated through cross-validation experiments. For model I, the mean cross-validated r2 and SD for 10 such cross-validation experiments were 0.946 and 0.503 log units, respectively. While for model II, they were 0.953 and 0.546 log units, respectively. Applying our models to estimate the water solubility values for the compounds in an independent test set, we found that model I can be applied to 13 out of 21 compounds with a SD equal to 0.58 log unit and model II can be applied to all the 21 compounds with a SD equal to 1.25 log units. Our models compare favorably to all the current available water estimation methods. A program based on this approach has been written in FORTRAN77 and is currently running on a VAX/VMS system. The program can be applied to estimate the water solubility of the water solubility of any organic chemical with a good or fairly good accuracy except for except for electrolytes. Applying our aqueous solubility estimation models to biodegradation studies, we found that although the water solubility was not the sole factor controlling the rate of biodegradation, ring compounds with greater solubilities were more likely to biodegrade at a faster rate. The significance of the relationship between water solubility and biodegradation activity has been illustrated by predicting the biodegradation activity of 27 new chemicals based solely on their estimated solubility values.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Estimation of Molecular Linear Free Energy Relation Descriptors Using a Group Contribution Approach
Platts, J. A., Butina, D., Abraham, M. H., & Hersey, A. (1999) · Journal of Chemical Information and Computer Sciences · doi:10.1021/ci980339t · Cited by 441
Discodermolide, A Cytotoxic Marine Agent That Stabilizes Microtubules More Potently Than Taxol,
ter Haar, E., Kowalski, R. J., Hamel, E., Lin, C. M., Longley, R. E., Gunasekera, S. P., Rosenkranz, H. S., & Day, B. W. (1996) · Biochemistry · doi:10.1021/bi9515127 · Cited by 382
Estimation of Aqueous Solubility for a Diverse Set of Organic Compounds Based on Molecular Topology
Huuskonen, J. (2000) · Journal of Chemical Information and Computer Sciences · doi:10.1021/ci9901338 · Cited by 306
Srinivas, K., King, J. W., Monrad, J. K., Howard, L. R., & Hansen, C. M. (2009) · Journal of Food Science · doi:10.1111/j.1750-3841.2009.01251.x · Cited by 96
Metadata
- Authors
- Klopman, G., Wang, S., & Balthasar, D. M.
- Venue
- Journal of Chemical Information and Computer Sciences
- Publisher
- American Chemical Society (ACS)
- Published
- 1992-09-01
- Volume
- 32
- Issue
- 5
- Pages
- 474-482
- ISSN
- 0095-2338 (ISSN-L)
- 1520-5142
- OpenAlex
- W1995892465
- Cited by
- 165
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 5.58
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Estimation of aqueous solubility of organic molecules by the group contribution approach. Application to the study of biodegradation. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1021/ci00009a013
- The paper
- Klopman, G., Wang, S., & Balthasar, D. M. (1992). Estimation of aqueous solubility of organic molecules by the group contribution approach. Application to the study of biodegradation. Journal of Chemical Information and Computer Sciences. https://doi.org/10.1021/ci00009a013
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.