The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Atomic physicochemical parameters for three-dimensional-structure-directed quantitative structure-activity relationships. 2. Modeling dispersive and hydrophobic interactions
Abstract
In an earlier paper (Ghose A. K.; Crippen, G. M. J. Comput. Chem. 1986, 7, 565) the need of atomic physicochemical properties for three-dimensional-structure-directed quantitative structure-activity relationships was demonstrated, and it was shown how atomic parameters can be developed to successfully evaluate the molecular water-1-octanol partition coefficient, which is a measure of hydrophobicity. In the present work the atomic values of molar refractivity are reported. Carbon, hydrogen, oxygen, nitrogen, sulfur, and halogens are divided into 110 atom types of which 93 atomic values are evaluated from 504 molecules by using a constrained least-squares technique. These values gave a standard deviation of 1.269 and a correlation coefficient of 0.994. The parameters were used to predict the molar refractivities of 78 compounds. The predicted values have a standard deviation of 1.614 and a correlation coefficient of 0.994. The degree of closeness of the linear relationship between the atomic water-1-octanol partition coefficients and molar refractivities has been checked by the correlation coefficient of 89 atom types used for both the properties. The correlation coefficient has been found to be 0.322. The low value suggests that both parameters can be used to model the intermolecular interaction. The origin of these physicochemical properties and the types of interaction that can be modeled by these properties have been critically analyzed.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
ChEMBL: a large-scale bioactivity database for drug discovery
Gaulton, A., Bellis, L. J., Bento, A. P., Chambers, J., Davies, M., Hersey, A., Light, Y., McGlinchey, S., Michalovich, D., Al-Lazikani, B., et al. (2012) · Nucleic Acids Research · doi:10.1093/nar/gkr777 · Cited by 4,382
Mordred: a molecular descriptor calculator
Moriwaki, H., Tian, Y.-S., Kawashita, N., & Takagi, T. (2018) · Journal of Cheminformatics · doi:10.1186/s13321-018-0258-y · Cited by 1,543
On Selection of Training and Test Sets for the Development of Predictive QSAR models
Leonard, J. T., & Roy, K. (2006) · QSAR & Combinatorial Science · doi:10.1002/qsar.200510161 · Cited by 257
Sorption of Deisopropylatrazine on Broiler Litter Biochars
Uchimiya, M., Wartelle, L. H., Lima, I. M., & Klasson, K. T. (2010) · Journal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry · doi:10.1021/jf102152q · Cited by 182
Apocynin: Chemical and Biophysical Properties of a NADPH Oxidase Inhibitor
Petrônio, M., Zeraik, M., Fonseca, L., & Ximenes, V. (2013) · Molecules · doi:10.3390/molecules18032821 · Cited by 149
Scoring Functions for Protein–Ligand Interactions
Sotriffer, C. (2012) · Protein‐Ligand Interactions · doi:10.1002/9783527645947.ch12 · Cited by 16
Aizezi, Y., Zhao, H., Zhang, Z., Bi, Y., Yang, Q., Guo, G., Zhang, H., Guo, H., Jiang, K., & Wang, Z.-Y. (2024) · The Plant Cell · doi:10.1093/plcell/koad299 · Cited by 16
Metadata
- Authors
- Ghose, A. K., & Crippen, G. M.
- Venue
- Journal of Chemical Information and Computer Sciences
- Publisher
- American Chemical Society (ACS)
- Published
- 1987-02-01
- Volume
- 27
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 21-35
- ISSN
- 0095-2338 (ISSN-L)
- 1520-5142
- OpenAlex
- W2048312836
- Cited by
- 803
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 2.83
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.