The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Conformer Generation with OMEGA: Algorithm and Validation Using High Quality Structures from the Protein Databank and Cambridge Structural Database
Open accessAbstract
Here, we present the algorithm and validation for OMEGA, a systematic, knowledge-based conformer generator. The algorithm consists of three phases: assembly of an initial 3D structure from a library of fragments; exhaustive enumeration of all rotatable torsions using values drawn from a knowledge-based list of angles, thereby generating a large set of conformations; and sampling of this set by geometric and energy criteria. Validation of conformer generators like OMEGA has often been undertaken by comparing computed conformer sets to experimental molecular conformations from crystallography, usually from the Protein Databank (PDB). Such an approach is fraught with difficulty due to the systematic problems with small molecule structures in the PDB. Methods are presented to identify a diverse set of small molecule structures from cocomplexes in the PDB that has maximal reliability. A challenging set of 197 high quality, carefully selected ligand structures from well-solved models was obtained using these methods. This set will provide a sound basis for comparison and validation of conformer generators in the future. Validation results from this set are compared to the results using structures of a set of druglike molecules extracted from the Cambridge Structural Database (CSD). OMEGA is found to perform very well in reproducing the crystallographic conformations from both these data sets using two complementary metrics of success.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
The PDBbind database: methodologies and updates
Wang, R., Fang, X., Lu, Y., Yang, C.-Y., & Wang, S. (2005) · Journal of Medicinal Chemistry · doi:10.1021/jm048957q · Cited by 933
Research works printed but not linked: 36
- Leach A. R., 1990, J. Comput. Chem., 11, 1193, 10.1002/jcc.540111012 · DOI
- Kearsley S. K., 1994, J. Comput.-Aided Mol. Des., 8, 565, 10.1007/BF00123666 · DOI
- Smellie A., 2003, J. Comput. Chem., 24, 10, 10.1002/jcc.10175 · doi:10.1002/jcc.10175
- Bohme-Leite T., 2007, Nucleic Acids Res., 35, W568, 10.1093/nar/gkm289 · DOI
- Vainio M. J., 2007, J. Chem. Inf. Model., 47, 2462, 10.1021/ci6005646 · DOI · Paper page
- Li J., 2007, J. Chem. Inf. Model., 47, 1923, 10.1021/ci700136x · doi:10.1021/ci700136x
- Gippert G. P., 1998, J. Biomol. NMR, 11, 241, 10.1023/A:1008209806860 · doi:10.1023/a:1008209806860
- Kristam R., 2005, J. Chem. Inf. Model., 45, 461, 10.1021/ci049731z · doi:10.1021/ci049731z
- Agrafiotis A. K., 2007, J. Chem. Inf. Model., 47, 1067, 10.1021/ci6005454 · DOI
- Bostrom J., 2003, J. Mol. Graphics Modell., 21, 449, 10.1016/S1093-3263(02)00204-8 · DOI · Paper page
- Berman H. M., 2000, Nucleic Acids Res., 28, 235, 10.1093/nar/28.1.235 · DOI · Paper page
- Sadowski J., 2006, J. Chem. Inf. Model., 46, 2305, 10.1021/ci060042s · doi:10.1021/ci060042s
- Hao M. H., 2007, J. Chem. Inf. Model., 46, 2242, 10.1021/ci700189s · DOI
- Abagyan R. A., 1997, J. Mol. Biol., 268, 678, 10.1006/jmbi.1997.0994 · DOI
- Kirchmair J., 2006, J. Chem. Inf. Model., 46, 1848, 10.1021/ci060084g · DOI
- Brameld K. A., 2008, J. Chem. Inf. Model., 48, 1, 10.1021/ci7002494 · DOI · Paper page
- Halgren T. A., 1996, J. Comput. Chem., 17, 490, 10.1002/(SICI)1096-987X(199604)17:5/6<490::AID-JCC1>3.0.CO;2-P · DOI · Paper page
- Hartshorn M. J., 2007, J. Med. Chem., 50, 726, 10.1021/jm061277y · DOI · Paper page
- Kleywegt G. J., 2000, Acta Crystallogr., 56, 249
- Hawkins P. C. D., 2008, J. Comput.-Aided Mol. Des., 22, 179, 10.1007/s10822-007-9166-3 · DOI · Paper page
- Brünger A. T., 1992, Nature, 355, 472, 10.1038/355472a0 · DOI · Paper page
- Cruickshank D. W., 1999, Acta Crystallogr., 55, 583
- Blow D. M., 2002, Acta Crystallogr., 58, 792
- Goto J., 2004, J. Med. Chem., 47, 6804, 10.1021/jm0493818 · DOI
- Murshudov G. N., 1997, Acta Crystallogr., 53, 240
- Jones T. A., 1991, Acta Crystallogr., 47, 110, 10.1107/S0108767390010224 · DOI · Paper page
- Grant A. J., 2006, J. Chem. Inf. Model., 46, 1912, 10.1021/ci6002152 · DOI
- CSD: The Cambridge Structural Database. Version 5.1.
- Perola E., 2004, J. Med. Chem., 47, 2499, 10.1021/jm030563w · DOI · Paper page
- Chen I.-J., 2008, J. Chem. Inf. Model., 48, 1773, 10.1021/ci800130k · DOI
- Feuston B. P., 2001, J. Chem. Inf. Comput. Sci., 41, 754, 10.1021/ci000464g · DOI
- Bostrom, J.Exploiting Ligand Conformations in Drug Design. EuroCUP I, Sheffield, UK, 2007. · DOI
- Goto J., 2008, J. Chem. Inf. Model., 48, 583, 10.1021/ci700352q · DOI
- Cole J. C., 2005, Proteins: Struct., Funct., Bioinf., 60, 325, 10.1002/prot.20497 · DOI · Paper page
- Yusuf D., 2008, J. Chem. Inf. Model., 48, 1411, 10.1021/ci800084x · DOI · Paper page
- Warren G. L., 2006, J. Med. Chem., 49, 5912, 10.1021/jm050362n · DOI · Paper page
Cited by
ZINC 15 – Ligand Discovery for Everyone
Sterling, T., & Irwin, J. J. (2015) · Journal of Chemical Information and Modeling · doi:10.1021/acs.jcim.5b00559 · Cited by 3,224
Directory of useful decoys, enhanced (DUD-E): better ligands and decoys for better benchmarking.
Mysinger, M. M., Carchia, M., Irwin, J. J., & Shoichet, B. K. (2012) · Journal of Medicinal Chemistry · doi:10.1021/jm300687e · Cited by 2,412
Ultra-large library docking for discovering new chemotypes
Lyu, J., Wang, S., Balius, T. E., Singh, I., Levit, A., Moroz, Y. S., O’Meara, M. J., Che, T., Algaa, E., Tolmachova, K., et al. (2019) · Nature · doi:10.1038/s41586-019-0917-9 · Cited by 998
CREST—A program for the exploration of low-energy molecular chemical space
Pracht, P., Grimme, S., Bannwarth, C., Bohle, F., Ehlert, S., Feldmann, G., Gorges, J., Müller, M., Neudecker, T., Plett, C., et al. (2024) · The Journal of Chemical Physics · doi:10.1063/5.0197592 · Cited by 574
Gentile, F., Yaacoub, J. C., Gleave, J., Fernandez, M., Ton, A.-T., Ban, F., Stern, A., & Cherkasov, A. (2022) · Nature Protocols · doi:10.1038/s41596-021-00659-2 · Cited by 397
Metadata
- Authors
- Hawkins, P. C. D., Skillman, A. G., Warren, G. L., Ellingson, B. A., & Stahl, M. T.
- Venue
- Journal of Chemical Information and Modeling
- Publisher
- American Chemical Society (ACS)
- Published
- 2010-03-17
- Volume
- 50
- Issue
- 4
- Pages
- 572-584
- ISSN
- 1549-9596 (ISSN-L)
- 1549-960X
- OpenAlex
- W2078374001
- Cited by
- 1,607
- References
- 1
- FWCI
- 38.53
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- hybrid
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Conformer Generation with OMEGA: Algorithm and Validation Using High Quality Structures from the Protein Databank and Cambridge Structural Database. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1021/ci100031x
- The paper
- Hawkins, P. C. D., Skillman, A. G., Warren, G. L., Ellingson, B. A., & Stahl, M. T. (2010). Conformer Generation with OMEGA: Algorithm and Validation Using High Quality Structures from the Protein Databank and Cambridge Structural Database. Journal of Chemical Information and Modeling. https://doi.org/10.1021/ci100031x
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.