The DOI matches its Crossref record.
The Scaffold Tree − Visualization of the Scaffold Universe by Hierarchical Scaffold Classification
Abstract
A hierarchical classification of chemical scaffolds (molecular framework, which is obtained by pruning all terminal side chains) has been introduced. The molecular frameworks form the leaf nodes in the hierarchy trees. By an iterative removal of rings, scaffolds forming the higher levels in the hierarchy tree are obtained. Prioritization rules ensure that less characteristic, peripheral rings are removed first. All scaffolds in the hierarchy tree are well-defined chemical entities making the classification chemically intuitive. The classification is deterministic, data-set-independent, and scales linearly with the number of compounds included in the data set. The application of the classification is demonstrated on two data sets extracted from the PubChem database, namely, pyruvate kinase binders and a collection of pesticides. The examples shown demonstrate that the classification procedure handles robustly synthetic structures and natural products.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Charting, Navigating, and Populating Natural Product Chemical Space for Drug Discovery
Lachance, H., Wetzel, S., Kumar, K., & Waldmann, H. (2012) · Journal of Medicinal Chemistry · doi:10.1021/jm300288g · Cited by 398
Self-citationRecent Advances in Scaffold Hopping: Miniperspective
Hu, Y., Stumpfe, D., & Bajorath, J. (2017) · Journal of Medicinal Chemistry · doi:10.1021/acs.jmedchem.6b01437 · Cited by 361
Fragment Informatics and Computational Fragment‐Based Drug Design: An Overview and Update
Sheng, C., & Zhang, W. (2013) · Medicinal Research Reviews · doi:10.1002/med.21255 · Cited by 80
Metadata
- Authors
- Schuffenhauer, A., Ertl, P., Roggo, S., Wetzel, S., Koch, M. A., & Waldmann, H.
- Venue
- Journal of Chemical Information and Modeling
- Publisher
- American Chemical Society (ACS)
- Published
- 2006-12-02
- Volume
- 47
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 47-58
- ISSN
- 1549-9596 (ISSN-L)
- 1549-960X
- OpenAlex
- W2179066627
- Cited by
- 364
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 16.74
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.