Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
CoChat
Sign Up
Cited by 317

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 36 of the 36 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Mold2, Molecular Descriptors from 2D Structures for Chemoinformatics and Toxicoinformatics

Hong, Huixiao, Xie, Qian, Ge, Weigong, Qian, Feng, Fang, Hong, Shi, Leming, Su, Zhenqiang, Perkins, Roger, Tong, Weida·2008·Journal of Chemical Information and Modeling
DOI 10.1021/ci800038f
Open this paper in CoChat — free account

Abstract

Research applications in chemoinformatics and toxicoinformatics increasingly use representations of molecules in the form of numerical descriptors that capture the structural characteristics and properties of molecules. These representations are useful for ADME/toxicity prediction, diversity analysis, library design, QSAR/QSPR, virtual screening, and other purposes. Molecular descriptors have ranged from relatively simple forms calculated from simple two-dimensional (2D) chemical structures to more complex forms representing three-dimensional (3D) chemical structures or complex molecular fingerprints consisting of numerous bit positions to represent specific chemical information. The Mold (2) software was developed to enable the rapid calculation of a large and diverse set of descriptors encoding two-dimensional chemical structure information. Comparative analysis of Mold (2) descriptors with those calculated by Cerius (2), Dragon, and Molconn-Z on several data sets using Shannon entropy analysis demonstrated that Mold (2) descriptors convey a similar amount of information. In addition, using the same classification method, slightly better models were generated using Mold (2) descriptors compared to those generated using descriptors from the compared commercial software packages. The low computing cost for Mold (2) makes it suitable not only for small data sets, such as in QSAR, but also for large databases in virtual screening. High reproducibility and reliability are expected because Mold (2) does not require 3D structures. Mold (2) is freely available to the public ( http://www.fda.gov/nctr/science/centers/toxicoinformatics/index.htm).

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1021/ci800038f

Cites

36 of 36 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Cited by

See all 317

Metadata

Authors
Hong, H., Xie, Q., Ge, W., Qian, F., Fang, H., Shi, L., Su, Z., Perkins, R., & Tong, W.
Venue
Journal of Chemical Information and Modeling
Publisher
American Chemical Society (ACS)
Published
2008-06-20
Volume
48
Issue
7
Pages
1337-1344
ISSN
  • 1549-9596 (ISSN-L)
  • 1549-960X
DOI
10.1021/ci800038f
OpenAlex
W2123676318
Cited by
317
References
36
FWCI
7.40
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.