The DOI matches its Crossref record.
RECAPRetrosynthetic Combinatorial Analysis Procedure: A Powerful New Technique for Identifying Privileged Molecular Fragments with Useful Applications in Combinatorial Chemistry
Abstract
The use of combinatorial chemistry for the generation of new lead molecules is now a well established strategy in the drug discovery process. Central to the use of combinatorial chemistry is the design and availability of high quality building blocks which are likely to afford hits from the libraries that they generate. Herein we describe "RECAP" (Retrosynthetic Combinatorial Analysis Procedure), a new computational technique designed to address this building block issue. RECAP electronically fragments molecules based on chemical knowledge. When applied to databases of biologically active molecules this allows the identification of building block fragments rich in biologically recognized elements and privileged motifs and structures. This allows the design of building blocks and the synthesis of libraries rich in biological motifs. Application of RECAP to the Derwent World Drug Index (WDI) and the molecular fragments/ building blocks that this generates are discussed. We also describe a WDI fragment knowledge base which we have built which stores the drug motifs and mention its potential application in structure based drug design programs.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Ertl, P., & Schuffenhauer, A. (2009) · Journal of Cheminformatics · doi:10.1186/1758-2946-1-8 · Cited by 1,939
Counting on natural products for drug design
Rodrigues, T., Reker, D., Schneider, P., & Schneider, G. (2016) · Nature Chemistry · doi:10.1038/nchem.2479 · Cited by 1,250
Reymond, J.-L. (2015) · Accounts of Chemical Research · doi:10.1021/ar500432k · Cited by 720
Chemical substructures that enrich for biological activity
Klekota, J., & Roth, F. P. (2008) · Bioinformatics · doi:10.1093/bioinformatics/btn479 · Cited by 392
Matched Molecular Pairs as a Medicinal Chemistry Tool: Miniperspective
Griffen, E., Leach, A. G., Robb, G. R., & Warner, D. J. (2011) · Journal of Medicinal Chemistry · doi:10.1021/jm200452d · Cited by 282
DOGS: Reaction-Driven de novo Design of Bioactive Compounds
Hartenfeller, M., Zettl, H., Walter, M., Rupp, M., Reisen, F., Proschak, E., Weggen, S., Stark, H., & Schneider, G. (2012) · PLoS Computational Biology · doi:10.1371/journal.pcbi.1002380 · Cited by 251
“A prominent example of this kind of rule set is the RECAP [8] (retrosynthetic combinatorial analysis procedure), which is also used by some de novo design tools [9–12].”
MethodFragment Informatics and Computational Fragment‐Based Drug Design: An Overview and Update
Sheng, C., & Zhang, W. (2013) · Medicinal Research Reviews · doi:10.1002/med.21255 · Cited by 80
Knowledge-Based Approach to de Novo Design Using Reaction Vectors
Patel, H., Bodkin, M. J., Chen, B., & Gillet, V. J. (2009) · Journal of Chemical Information and Modeling · doi:10.1021/ci800413m · Cited by 82
DENOPTIM: Software for Computational de Novo Design of Organic and Inorganic Molecules
Foscato, M., Venkatraman, V., & Jensen, V. R. (2019) · Journal of Chemical Information and Modeling · doi:10.1021/acs.jcim.9b00516 · Cited by 45
LIGHTHOUSE illuminates therapeutics for a variety of diseases including COVID-19
(2022) · doi:10.1016/j.isci.2022.105314 · Cited by 9
Metadata
- Authors
- Lewell, X. Q., Judd, D. B., Watson, S. P., & Hann, M. M.
- Venue
- Journal of Chemical Information and Computer Sciences
- Publisher
- American Chemical Society (ACS)
- Published
- 1998-04-11
- Volume
- 38
- Issue
- 3
- Pages
- 511-522
- ISSN
- 0095-2338 (ISSN-L)
- 1520-5142
- OpenAlex
- W1991286793
- Cited by
- 691
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 14.56
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.