The DOI matches its Crossref record.
On the Properties of Bit String-Based Measures of Chemical Similarity
Abstract
With the growth of interest in database searching and compound selection, the quantification of chemical similarity has become an area of intense practical and theoretical interest. One of the most widely used methods of measuring chemical similarity is based on mapping fragments within a molecule as bits within a binary string. We present empirical results which suggest that bit strings provide a nonintuitive encoding of molecular size, shape, and global similarity. Other results, this time statistical in nature, suggest that the observed behavior of bit string-based searches have a large nonspecific component. On this basis, we question whether bit string-based similarity methods possess all the features desirable in a quantitative chemical distance measure or metric and suggest that there are instances when they may not be the most appropriate tool for searching or segregating chemical structures.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
No references could be resolved yet.
Research works printed but not linked: 20
- Hodgkin E. E., 1987, Int. J. Quant. Chem., 14, 110
- Blaney F. E., 1995, J. Molecular Graph., 13, 174, 10.1016/0263-7855(95)00015-X · DOI
- Ashton M. J., 1996, Drug. Discovery Today, 1, 78
- Kauver L. M., 1995, Chem. Biol., 2, 118
- Weinstein J. N., 1997, Science, 275, 9, 10.1126/science.275.5298.343 · DOI · Paper page
- Brown R. D., 1996, J. Chem. Inf. Comput. Sci., 36, 584, 10.1021/ci9501047 · DOI · Paper page
- Brown R. D., 1997, J. Chem. Inf. Comput. Sci., 37, 9, 10.1021/ci960373c · DOI · Paper page
- Lewis R. A., 1997, J. Chem. Inf. Comp. Sci., 37, 614, 10.1021/ci960471y · DOI
- Basak S. C., 1995, J. Chem. Inf. Comput. Sci., 35, 372, 10.1021/ci00025a004 · doi:10.1021/ci00025a004
- Sheridan R. P., 1996, J. Chem. Inf. Comput. Sci., 36, 136, 10.1021/ci950275b · DOI · Paper page
- Kearsley S. K., 1996, J. Chem. Inf. Comput. Sci., 36, 127, 10.1021/ci950274j · DOI · Paper page
- Holliday J. D., 1995, Quant. Struct.-Act. Relat., 14, 506, 10.1002/qsar.19950140602 · doi:10.1002/qsar.19950140602
- Martin E. J., 1995, J. Med. Chem., 38, 1436
- Patterson D. E., 1996, J. Med. Chem., 39, 3059, 10.1021/jm960290n · DOI · Paper page
- James C. A., 1995, Daylight Theory Manual
- Hall M., 1986, Combinatorial Theory
- Vogt G., 1995, J. Mol. Biol., 249, 31, 10.1006/jmbi.1995.0340 · DOI · Paper page
- Flower D. R., 1993, Prot. Science, 2, 761, 10.1002/pro.5560020507 · DOI · Paper page
- Flower D. R, 1993, FEBS Lett., 333, 102, 10.1016/0014-5793(93)80382-5 · DOI
- Lynch M. F., 1974, Computer Representation and Manipulation of Chemical lnformation
Cited by
Similarity-based virtual screening using 2D fingerprints
Willett, P. (2006) · Drug Discovery Today · doi:10.1016/j.drudis.2006.10.005 · Cited by 849
Do Structurally Similar Molecules Have Similar Biological Activity?
Martin, Y. C., Kofron, J. L., & Traphagen, L. M. (2002) · Journal of Medicinal Chemistry · doi:10.1021/jm020155c · Cited by 806
Why do we need so many chemical similarity search methods?
Sheridan, R. (2002) · Drug Discovery Today · doi:10.1016/s1359-6446(02)02411-x · Cited by 412
Sastry, M., Lowrie, J. F., Dixon, S. L., & Sherman, W. (2010) · Journal of Chemical Information and Modeling · doi:10.1021/ci100062n · Cited by 332
Bender, A., Mussa, H. Y., Glen, R. C., & Reiling, S. (2004) · Journal of Chemical Information and Computer Sciences · doi:10.1021/ci0498719 · Cited by 322
Metadata
- Authors
- Flower, D. R.
- Venue
- Journal of Chemical Information and Computer Sciences
- Publisher
- American Chemical Society (ACS)
- Published
- 1998-04-04
- Volume
- 38
- Issue
- 3
- Pages
- 379-386
- ISSN
- 0095-2338 (ISSN-L)
- 1520-5142
- OpenAlex
- W2160114756
- Cited by
- 345
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 15.57
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: On the Properties of Bit String-Based Measures of Chemical Similarity. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1021/ci970437z
- The paper
- Flower, D. R. (1998). On the Properties of Bit String-Based Measures of Chemical Similarity. Journal of Chemical Information and Computer Sciences. https://doi.org/10.1021/ci970437z
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.
