Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 187

The DOI matches its Crossref record.

Analysis of a Large Structure/Biological Activity Data Set Using Recursive Partitioning

Rusinko, Andrew, Farmen, Mark W., Lambert, Christophe G., Brown, Paul L., Young, S. Stanley·1999·Journal of Chemical Information and Computer Sciences

Abstract

Combinatorial chemistry and high-throughput screening are revolutionizing the process of lead discovery in the pharmaceutical industry. Large numbers of structures and vast quantities of biological assay data are quickly being accumulated, overwhelming traditional structure/activity relationship (SAR) analysis technologies. Recursive partitioning is a method for statistically determining rules that classify objects into similar categories or, in this case, structures into groups of molecules with similar potencies. SCAM is a computer program implemented to make extremely efficient use of this methodology. Depending on the size of the data set, rules explaining biological data can be determined interactively. An example data set of 1650 monoamine oxidase inhibitors exemplifies the method, yielding substructural rules and leading to general classifications of these inhibitors. The method scales linearly with the number of descriptors, so hundreds of thousands of structures can be analyzed utilizing thousands to millions of molecular descriptors. There are currently no methods to deal with statistical analysis problems of this size. An important aspect of this analysis is the ability to deal with mixtures, i.e., identify SAR rules for classes of compounds in the same data set that might be binding in different ways. Most current quantitative structure/activity relationship methods require that the compounds follow a single mechanism. Advantages and limitations of this methodology are presented.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1021/ci9903049

Cites

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cited by

See all 187

Metadata

Authors
Rusinko, A., Farmen, M. W., Lambert, C. G., Brown, P. L., & Young, S. S.
Venue
Journal of Chemical Information and Computer Sciences
Published
1999-10-30
Volume
39
Issue
6
Pages
1017-1026
ISSN
0095-2338 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W1994126845
Cited by
187
References
0
FWCI
15.72
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Analysis of a Large Structure/Biological Activity Data Set Using Recursive Partitioning. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1021/ci9903049
The paper
Rusinko, A., Farmen, M. W., Lambert, C. G., Brown, P. L., & Young, S. S. (1999). Analysis of a Large Structure/Biological Activity Data Set Using Recursive Partitioning. Journal of Chemical Information and Computer Sciences. https://doi.org/10.1021/ci9903049

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.