The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Dye-Sensitized Core−Shell Nanocrystals: Improved Efficiency of Mesoporous Tin Oxide Electrodes Coated with a Thin Layer of an Insulating Oxide
Open accessAbstract
Coating nanocrystalline SnO 2 electrodes for dye-sensitized solar cell applications with a thin layer of ZnO, TiO 2, ZrO 2, MgO, Al 2 O 3, Y 2 O 3, or other insulating oxides was found to improve dye adsorption and increase the sensitized photocurrent. The surface of the oxide coating is more basic than SnO 2, which renders dye attachment by its carboxyl groups more favorable. At the same time, the photovoltage and fill factor are strongly enhanced, resulting in much better energy conversion efficiencies. This change is ascribed to inhibition of electron back transfer from SnO 2 to the redox electrolyte (I 3 - ) by the insulating oxide. The optimum coating thickness is only a few angstroms, suggesting that electron transfer from the excited dye attached to the oxide surface to the underlying SnO 2 occurs by tunneling through the insulator layer. Different methods for coating SnO 2 nanocrystals with a thin layer of an insulating oxide were compared. The best results were obtained by adding a soluble metal salt to the SnO 2 colloid, which is converted to the oxide on firing of the electrode. Specific adsorption of the metal ions on the SnO 2 surface guarantees homogeneous coating at near-monolayer coverage. Although the energy conversion efficiency of such modified SnO 2 electrodes is still inferior to that of the usually employed TiO 2 electrodes, the larger band gap of SnO 2 offers the advantage of better long-term stability of the solar cell in the presence of UV light. Surface modification of nanocrystalline TiO 2 electrodes with very thin insulating oxide layers also improves the photovoltage but diminishes the current. Because of a blue shift in the photocurrent onset of insulator-coated TiO 2, the solar cell stability in UV light is again enhanced.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
A low-cost, high-efficiency solar cell based on dye-sensitized colloidal TiO2 films
O'Regan, B., & Grätzel, M. (1991) · Nature · doi:10.1038/353737a0 · Cited by 28,599
Self-citation
Cited by
Photoelectrocatalytic materials for environmental applications
Zhang, H., Chen, G., & Bahnemann, D. W. (2009) · Journal of Materials Chemistry · doi:10.1039/b821991e · Cited by 960
Composite Titanium Dioxide Nanomaterials
Dahl, M., Liu, Y., & Yin, Y. (2014) · Chemical Reviews · doi:10.1021/cr400634p · Cited by 687
Nanostructured photoelectrodes for dye-sensitized solar cells
Zhang, Q., & Cao, G. (2011) · Nano Today · doi:10.1016/j.nantod.2010.12.007 · Cited by 631
Schmidt, H., Giustiniano, F., & Eda, G. (2015) · Chemical Society Reviews · doi:10.1039/c5cs00275c · Cited by 466
Two‐Dimensional Metal Oxide Nanomaterials for Next‐Generation Rechargeable Batteries
Mei, J., Liao, T., Kou, L., & Sun, Z. (2017) · Advanced Materials · doi:10.1002/adma.201700176 · Cited by 459
Metadata
- Authors
- Kay, A., & Grätzel, M.
- Venue
- Chemistry of Materials
- Publisher
- American Chemical Society (ACS)
- Published
- 2002-06-26
- Volume
- 14
- Issue
- 7
- Pages
- 2930-2935
- ISSN
- 0897-4756 (ISSN-L)
- 1520-5002
- OpenAlex
- W2071503210
- Cited by
- 775
- References
- 1
- FWCI
- 19.73
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Dye-Sensitized Core−Shell Nanocrystals: Improved Efficiency of Mesoporous Tin Oxide Electrodes Coated with a Thin Layer of an Insulating Oxide. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1021/cm0115968
- The paper
- Kay, A., & Grätzel, M. (2002). Dye-Sensitized Core−Shell Nanocrystals: Improved Efficiency of Mesoporous Tin Oxide Electrodes Coated with a Thin Layer of an Insulating Oxide. Chemistry of Materials. https://doi.org/10.1021/cm0115968
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.