Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 313

The DOI matches its Crossref record.

Digestive-Ripening Agents for Gold Nanoparticles: Alternatives to Thiols

Prasad, B. L. V., Stoeva, Savka I., Sorensen, Christopher M., Klabunde, Kenneth J.·2003·Chemistry of Materials

Abstract

Several ligands, such as alkylthiols, -amines, -silanes, -phosphines, -halides, and simple alkanes, were employed for digestive ripening, a process in which a colloidal suspension in a solvent is refluxed at the solvent boiling temperature in the presence of a surface-active ligand to convert a highly polydisperse colloid into a nearly monodisperse one. Apart from thiols, which are the only established digestive-ripening ligands, amines, silanes, and phosphines were found to be similarly efficient for this purpose. The important steps involved in the digestive ripening were identified to be (1) breaking the polydisperse colloid into smaller size particles upon addition of the ligand, (2) isolating this colloid from the reaction side products, and finally (3) heating this isolated colloid in the presence of the ligand to form a nearly monodisperse colloid. The successful ligands could be differentiated from the others based on their effectiveness to perform the different tasks in each step. Namely, they broke the bigger nanoparticles into smaller ones in the first step, formed a stable redispersable colloid in toluene after the second step, and at the end of the third step lead to a nearly monodisperse colloid. The ability of the different ligands to break the bigger, prismatic as-prepared particles in the first step varied as RSH ≈ RNH 2 ≈ R 3 P ≈ RSiH 3 > RI > ROH ≈ RBr and simple alkanes completely failed to induce any changes in the size and shape of the as-prepared colloid. Ligands such as RI, RBr, and ROH failed in the second step, possibly because of the poor ligand−gold interaction. The ligand−gold interaction trends observed here could be rationalized semiqualitatively by invoking the hard and soft acid and base theory, which suggests that a soft acid-like gold likes to interact with softer bases such as RSH and R 3 P rather than hard bases such as ROH. After the third step, the sizes of the nearly monodisperse particles depended on the ligand used for digestive ripening and correlated well with the ligand−gold interaction trends.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1021/cm0206439

Cites

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cited by

See all 313

Metadata

Authors
Prasad, B. L. V., Stoeva, S. I., Sorensen, C. M., & Klabunde, K. J.
Venue
Chemistry of Materials
Published
2003-01-25
Volume
15
Issue
4
Pages
935-942
ISSN
  • 0897-4756 (ISSN-L)
  • 1520-5002
OpenAlex
W2040785659
Cited by
313
References
0
FWCI
9.38
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Digestive-Ripening Agents for Gold Nanoparticles: Alternatives to Thiols. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1021/cm0206439
The paper
Prasad, B. L. V., Stoeva, S. I., Sorensen, C. M., & Klabunde, K. J. (2003). Digestive-Ripening Agents for Gold Nanoparticles: Alternatives to Thiols. Chemistry of Materials. https://doi.org/10.1021/cm0206439

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.