The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Hexagonal Sodium Yttrium Fluoride Based Green and Blue Emitting Upconversion Phosphors
Abstract
Hexagonal sodium yttrium fluoride, NaYF 4, is the most efficient host material to date for green (Yb 3+ /Er 3+ doped) and blue (Yb 3+ /Tm 3+ doped) upconversion (UC) phosphors, i.e., phosphors which emit visible light upon infrared (IR) excitation. The structure of the hexagonal phase gives rise to controversy about the cation sites and distribution. The X-ray diffraction patterns of our phosphors do not fit well with the crystal structure reported for NaNdF 4 (space group P 6̄, Z = 1.5). The Na:M ratio (M = Y, Nd, Er, Tm, Yb) of the hexagonal phase deviates significantly from 1:1, and it depends on M and the preparation temperature. It is proposed that the hexagonal phase is isostructural to the chlorides Na 3 x M 2 - x Cl 6 with M = La−Sm. This structure (space group P 6 3 / m, Z = 1) contains only one M 3+ site which is partially occupied by Na +, and the formula Na 3 x M 2 - x F 6 ( x ≈ 0.45) accounts for the nonstoichiometry. The model was derived from powder X-ray diffraction on the green and blue phosphor materials as well as the pure Nd, Y, and Yb compounds. The light emission properties of the material crucially depend on the phase purity, doping ratio, Na:M ratio, and preparation temperature. Because earlier spectroscopic investigations generally suffered from impure materials which reduced the UC efficiency, a new, reproducible preparation route was developed. Its key features are an excess of NaF in the synthesis, i.e., a 2:1 ratio of Na:M, the use of HF gas for fluorination, and a process temperature lower than the melting point of the respective NaF/MF 3 eutecticum. It yields the pure hexagonal phase without admixture of the cubic phase or other impurities except for minor inclusions of NaF. Upon IR excitation at 10 245 cm - 1, the samples doped with 18% Yb + 2% Er and 25% Yb + 0.3% Tm showed the highest UC efficiencies for green and blue emission, respectively. Relative UC efficiencies were measured with a powder test setup in a standard procedure. The doping ratios and all steps of the synthesis were optimized with respect to the UC efficiency. The obtained phosphor materials show no degradation under high-power IR laser excitation.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Shannon, R. D. (1976) · Acta Crystallographica Section A · doi:10.1107/s0567739476001551 · Cited by 66,145
Cited by
Zheng, W., Huang, P., Tu, D., Ma, E., Zhu, H., & Chen, X. (2015) · Chemical Society Reviews · doi:10.1039/c4cs00178h · Cited by 894
Chen, Z., Chen, H., Hu, H., Yu, M., Li, F., Zhang, Q., Zhou, Z., Yi, T., & Huang, C. (2008) · Journal of the American Chemical Society · doi:10.1021/ja076151k · Cited by 836
Metadata
- Authors
- Krämer, K. W., Biner, D., Frei, G., Güdel, H. U., Hehlen, M. P., & Lüthi, S. R.
- Venue
- Chemistry of Materials
- Publisher
- American Chemical Society (ACS)
- Published
- 2004-03-02
- Volume
- 16
- Issue
- 7
- Pages
- 1244-1251
- ISSN
- 0897-4756 (ISSN-L)
- 1520-5002
- OpenAlex
- W2092049539
- Cited by
- 1,172
- References
- 1
- FWCI
- 12.50
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.