The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Strong Akaganeite Aerogel Monoliths Using Epoxides: Synthesis and Characterization
Abstract
The synthesis of iron(III) oxide aerogel monoliths was performed by adding any one of several different 1,2- and 1,3-epoxides to ethanolic Fe(III) salt solutions at room temperature. While all of the epoxides examined resulted in gel formation, robust low-density (∼30−40 kg/m 3; 99% porous), high-surface-area (∼250−300 m 2 /g), aerogel monoliths were prepared by the addition of 1,3-epoxide derivatives to solutions of FeCl 3 ·6H 2 O, followed by drying with supercritical CO 2 . Both types of iron(III) oxide aerogels (those made with 1,2- and 1,3-epoxides respectively) were characterized using elemental analysis, X-ray diffraction, thermal analysis, acoustic measurements, transmission electron microscopy, scanning electron microscopy, and N 2 adsorption desorption analysis. Elemental analyses and powder X-ray diffraction indicated that the strong aerogel monoliths made with the 1,3-epoxides are made up predominately of polycrystalline β-FeOOH, akaganeite, and those made with the 1,2-epoxides are amorphous. To our knowledge, this is first known report of synthesis and characterization of akaganeite aerogel materials. Transmission electron microscopy analysis indicates that aerogels derived using 1,3-epoxides have a microstructure made up of a highly reticulated network of fibers with diameters from ∼5 to 35 nm and lengths several times that, whereas those resulting from the use of 1,2-epoxides consist of interconnected spherical particles, whose diameters are 5−15 nm. The difference in microstructure results in each type of aerogel displaying very distinct physical and mechanical properties. In particular, the stiffness of the β-FeOOH aerogels is remarkable for a transition metal oxide aerogel. Monolithic cylinders of β-FeOOH aerogel can be sintered at 515 °C, transforming to α-Fe 2 O 3 without shattering.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Chemistry of Aerogels and Their Applications
Pierre, A. C., & Pajonk, G. M. (2002) · Chemical Reviews · doi:10.1021/cr0101306 · Cited by 2,239
Cited by
A Special Material or a New State of Matter: A Review and Reconsideration of the Aerogel
Du, A., Zhou, B., Zhang, Z., & Shen, J. (2013) · Materials · doi:10.3390/ma6030941 · Cited by 481
Monolithic aerogel photocatalysts: a review
Wan, W., Zhang, R., Ma, M., & Zhou, Y. (2018) · Journal of Materials Chemistry A · doi:10.1039/c7ta09227j · Cited by 205
Synthesis of aerogels: from molecular routes to 3-dimensional nanoparticle assembly
Rechberger, F., & Niederberger, M. (2017) · Nanoscale Horizons · doi:10.1039/c6nh00077k · Cited by 148
Facile Synthesis of a Crystalline, High‐Surface‐Area SnO2 Aerogel
Baumann, T. F., Kucheyev, S. O., Gash, A. E., & Satcher, J. H. (2005) · Advanced Materials · doi:10.1002/adma.200500074 · Cited by 145
Self-citationMonolithic nickel(II)-based aerogels using an organic epoxide: the importance of the counterion
Gash, A. E., Satcher, J. H., & Simpson, R. L. (2004) · Journal of Non-Crystalline Solids · doi:10.1016/j.jnoncrysol.2004.06.030 · Cited by 136
Self-citation
Metadata
- Authors
- Gash, A. E., Satcher, & Simpson, R. L.
- Venue
- Chemistry of Materials
- Publisher
- American Chemical Society (ACS)
- Published
- 2003-07-23
- Volume
- 15
- Issue
- 17
- Pages
- 3268-3275
- ISSN
- 0897-4756 (ISSN-L)
- 1520-5002
- OpenAlex
- W2052070060
- Cited by
- 167
- References
- 1
- FWCI
- 3.03
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.