Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 197

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Porous Polybenzimidazole Membranes Doped with Phosphoric Acid: Highly Proton-Conducting Solid Electrolytes

Mecerreyes, David, Grande, Hans, Miguel, Oscar, Ochoteco, Estibalitz, Marcilla, Rebeca, Cantero, Igor·2004·Chemistry of Materials

Abstract

New proton-conducting polymer electrolytes based on new porous films of polybenzimidazole doped with phosphoric acid have been obtained. The porous polybenzimidazole films were prepared by leaching out a low-molecular-weight compound using a selective solvent of the porogen from polymer/porogen mixtures. This method allows control over the porosity level up to porosities of 75%. The pore size and morphology strongly depend on the porogen/PBI ratio as observed by SEM. The pore size varies from <100 nm with spherical shape for low porosities to very irregular and interconnected structures of 10−15 μm at the highest porosity levels. Different porogens lead to smaller pore sizes in the order dibutyl phthalate>dimethyl phthalate>diphenyl phthalate>triphenyl phosphate. The acid uptake of the membranes, and therefore the ionic conductivity of the films, increases with the porosity. Ionic conductivity as high as 5 × 10 - 2 S/cm and mechanically stable membranes are easily obtained by soaking the highly porous films in phosphoric acid solutions.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1021/cm034398k

Cites

1 of 1 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cited by

Metadata

Authors
Mecerreyes, D., Grande, H., Miguel, O., Ochoteco, E., Marcilla, R., & Cantero, I.
Venue
Chemistry of Materials
Published
2004-01-28
Volume
16
Issue
4
Pages
604-607
ISSN
  • 0897-4756 (ISSN-L)
  • 1520-5002
OpenAlex
W1990982074
Cited by
197
References
1
FWCI
8.17
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.