Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 519

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 2 of the 2 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Critical Size of a Nano SnO2 Electrode for Li-Secondary Battery

Kim, Chunjoong, Noh, Mijung, Choi, Myungsuk, Cho, Jaephil, Park, Byungwoo·2005·Chemistry of Materials

Abstract

SnO 2 nanoparticles with different sizes of ∼3, ∼4, and ∼8 nm were synthesized using a hydrothermal method at 110, 150, and 200 °C, respectively. The results showed that the ∼3 nm-sized SnO 2 nanoparticles had a superior capacity and cycling stability as compared to the ∼4 and ∼8 nm-sized ones. The ∼3 nm-sized nanoparticles exhibited an initial capacity of 740 mAh/g with negligible capacity fading. The electrochemical properties of these nanoparticles were superior to those of thin-film analogues. Transmission electron microscopy (TEM) and X-ray diffraction (XRD) confirmed that the ∼3 nm-sized SnO 2 nanoparticles after electrochemical tests did not aggregate into larger Sn clusters, in contrast to those observed with the ∼4 and ∼8 nm-sized ones.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1021/cm048003o

Cites

2 of 2 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 2 references

Cited by

Metadata

Authors
Kim, C., Noh, M., Choi, M., Cho, J., & Park, B.
Venue
Chemistry of Materials
Published
2005-05-10
Volume
17
Issue
12
Pages
3297-3301
ISSN
  • 0897-4756 (ISSN-L)
  • 1520-5002
OpenAlex
W2027832721
Cited by
519
References
2
FWCI
17.80
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.