Synthesis and Crystal Structure of Zeolite RUB-41 Obtained as Calcination Product of a Layered Precursor: a Systematic Approach to a New Synthesis Route
Abstract
Zeolite RUB-41, framework type code RRO, having a new framework structure has been synthesized as a calcination product using a layered silicate, RUB-39, as precursor. The precursor was obtained from hydrothermal synthesis using dimethyldipropylammonium hydroxide as structure directing agent. RUB-41, 18SiO 2 per unit cell, crystallizes in the monoclinic space group P 2/ c with a = 7.345(1) Å, b = 8.724(1) Å, c = 17.125(1) Å, and β = 114.2(1)°. The material has a 2-dimensional channel system with intersecting 8- and 10-membered ring pores. The pore openings determined from structure analysis are 5.8 Å × 4.1 Å (8MR) and 5.9 Å × 4.1 Å (10MR). The surface area determined from nitrogen adsorption experiments is 510 m 2 /g and the pore space is accessible for linear molecules. The material shows high sorption interaction for C4 alkenes and excludes i-butane from the pore system.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
New zeolites can be obtained by topotactic transformation in which labile atoms are removed by mild secondary treatments followed by condensation or pillarization of remaining zeolitic layers, providing new fully ordered microporous materials.
“On the other hand, new zeolites can be obtained by topotactic transformation in which some labile atoms are removed by mild secondary treatments followed by condensation or pillarization of the remaining zeolitic layers, providing new fully ordered microporous materials.72,103,124−126”
From Zeolites in Adsorption Processes: State of the Art and Future Prospects (2022) · cites this paper as [126]
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Zeolites in Adsorption Processes: State of the Art and Future Prospects
Pérez-Botella, E., Valencia, S., & Rey, F. (2022) · Chemical Reviews · doi:10.1021/acs.chemrev.2c00140 · Cited by 1,126 · see citing works
Translating new materials discoveries in zeolite research to commercial manufacture
Zones, S. I. (2011) · Microporous and Mesoporous Materials · doi:10.1016/j.micromeso.2011.03.039 · Cited by 227 · see citing works
Guo, P., Strohmaier, K., Vroman, H., Afeworki, M., Ravikovitch, P. I., Paur, C. S., Sun, J., Burton, A., & Zou, X. (2016) · Inorganic Chemistry Frontiers · doi:10.1039/c6qi00262e · Cited by 29 · see citing works
- Authors
- Wang, Y. X., Gies, H., Marler, B., & Müller, U.
- Affiliations
- Ruhr University Bochum (DE)
- BASF (Germany) (DE)
- Corresponding author
- Gies, H.
- ORCID
- Venue
- Chemistry of Materials
- Publisher
- American Chemical Society (ACS)
- Published
- 2004-12-15
- Volume
- 17
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 43-49
- ISSN
- 0897-4756 (ISSN-L)
- 1520-5002
- OpenAlex
- W2075732868
- Cited by
- 173
- References
- 0
- Citations by year
- 2026: 5 · 2025: 3 · 2024: 2 · 2023: 5 · 2022: 4 · 2021: 7 · 2020: 8 · 2019: 6 · 2018: 5 · 2017: 12 · 2016: 11 · 2015: 14 · 2014: 18 · 2013: 10 · 2012: 8
- FWCI
- 3.68
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Chemistry of Materials (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Physical Sciences › Chemistry › Inorganic Chemistry › Zeolite Catalysis and Synthesis
- Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Waste Management and Disposal › Chemical Synthesis and Characterization
- Physical Sciences › Materials Science › Biomaterials › Clay minerals and soil interactions
- Keywords
- zeolite synthesis, structure-directing agent, crystal structure
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review