The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Phase Properties of Carbon-Supported Gold−Platinum Nanoparticles with Different Bimetallic Compositions
Abstract
The ability to control the composition and phase properties of bimetallic nanoparticles is critical in exploring catalytic properties. In this paper we present results from a study aimed at determining those properties for carbon-supported gold−platinum (AuPt) catalysts with different bimetallic compositions. The bimetallic nanoparticle catalysts are prepared by a two-phase synthesis protocol employing organic monolayer encapsulation on bimetallic AuPt cores (∼2 nm). The size-controlled nanoparticles are assembled on carbon black support materials with controllable dispersion and metal loading and are further treated by calcination under controlled temperature and atmosphere. The core composition of the bimetallic nanoparticles is determined by direct current plasma-atomic emission spectroscopy. Structural characterization is carried out by X-ray diffraction. The bimetallic nanoparticles were shown to display alloy properties, which is in sharp contrast to the bimetallic miscibility gap known for the bulk counterpart of the bimetallic metals. This finding demonstrates the difference of the physical and chemical properties for nanoscale materials from the bulk crystalline state, revealing important details of the phase properties of the bimetallic nanoparticle catalysts and new information for the correlation between the composition and the phase properties at the nanoscale. Implications of our findings to the design and manipulation of the bimetallic nanoparticles for catalytic applications are also discussed.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Catalytic nanoarchitectures—The importance of nothing and the unimportance of periodicity
Rolison, D. R. (2003) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.1082332 · Cited by 1,037
Cited by
Platinum-Based Nanostructured Materials: Synthesis, Properties, and Applications
Chen, A., & Holt-Hindle, P. (2010) · Chemical Reviews · doi:10.1021/cr9003902 · Cited by 1,390
Peng, Z., & Yang, H. (2009) · Nano Today · doi:10.1016/j.nantod.2008.10.010 · Cited by 1,085
Bezerra, C. W. B., Zhang, L., Liu, H., Lee, K., Marques, A. L. B., Marques, E. P., Wang, H., & Zhang, J. (2007) · Journal of Power Sources · doi:10.1016/j.jpowsour.2007.08.028 · Cited by 439
Luo, J., Njoki, P. N., Lin, Y., Mott, D., Wang, & Zhong, C.-J. (2006) · Langmuir · doi:10.1021/la0529557 · Cited by 287
Self-citationWanjala, B. N., Luo, J., Loukrakpam, R., Fang, B., Mott, D., Njoki, P. N., Engelhard, M., Naslund, H. R., Wu, J. K., Wang, L., et al. (2010) · Chemistry of Materials · doi:10.1021/cm101109e · Cited by 226
Self-citation
Metadata
- Authors
- Luo, J., Maye, M. M., Petkov, V., Kariuki, N. N., Wang, L., Njoki, P., Mott, D., Lin, Y., & Zhong, C.-J.
- Venue
- Chemistry of Materials
- Publisher
- American Chemical Society (ACS)
- Published
- 2005-05-11
- Volume
- 17
- Issue
- 12
- Pages
- 3086-3091
- ISSN
- 0897-4756 (ISSN-L)
- 1520-5002
- OpenAlex
- W2032227010
- Cited by
- 258
- References
- 1
- FWCI
- 10.08
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.