Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
CoChat
Sign Up
Cited by 573

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 61 of the 61 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Polymorphous Transformations of Nanometric Iron(III) Oxide: A Review

Open access
Machala, Libor, Tuček, Jiří, Zbořil, Radek·2011·Chemistry of Materials
DOI 10.1021/cm200397g
Open this paper in CoChat — free account

Abstract

There is great interest in iron oxides, especially in nanosized form, for both fundamental and practical reasons. Because of its polymorphism, iron(III) oxide (ferric oxide, Fe2O3) is one of the most interesting and potentially useful phases of the iron oxides. Each of the four different known crystalline Fe2O3 polymorphs (alpha-, beta-, gamma-, and epsilon-Fe2O3) has unique biochemical, magnetic, catalytic, and other properties that make it suitable for specific technical and biomedical applications. High temperature treatment is a key step in most syntheses of iron(III) oxides but often triggers polymorphous transformations that result in the formation of undesired mixtures of Fe2O3 polymorphs. It is therefore important to control the parameters that induce polymorphous transformations when seeking to prepare a given Fe2O3 polymorph as a single phase; identifying and understanding these parameters is a major challenge in the study of the polymorphism of solid compounds. This review discusses the dependence of the mechanism and kinetics of the polymorphous transformations of Fe2O3 on the intrinsic properties of the material (polymorph structure, particle size, particle morphology, surface coating, particle aggregation, incorporation of particles within a matrix) and external parameters of synthetic and/or natural conditions such as temperature, atmosphere, and pressure. The high-temperature and high-pressure induced transformations of Fe2O3 are reviewed in detail. In addition, the question of whether different Fe2O3 polymorphs are formed sequentially or simultaneously during thermal processes is discussed extensively, with reference to the experimental results that have been invoked to support these two different mechanisms. The use of selected analytical tools in studying the polymorphous transformations of Fe2O3 is also discussed, with particular emphasis on in situ approaches. Finally, key objectives for future research in this area are highlighted: (i) the development of more sophisticated kinetic control of the γ-Fe2O3 → ε-Fe2O3 phase transformation; (ii) investigation of particle morphology changes during the polymorphous transformations of Fe2O3; and (iii) the study of high-pressure induced phase transformations of Fe2O3 polymorphs other than α-Fe2O3.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1021/cm200397g

Cites

61 of 61 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

1 retracted

Cited by

See all 573

Metadata

Authors
Machala, L., Tuček, J., & Zbořil, R.
Venue
Chemistry of Materials
Publisher
American Chemical Society (ACS)
Published
2011-06-01
Volume
23
Issue
14
Pages
3255-3272
ISSN
  • 0897-4756 (ISSN-L)
  • 1520-5002
DOI
10.1021/cm200397g
OpenAlex
W2334493053
Cited by
573
References
61
FWCI
9.85
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
hybrid

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.