The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Preparation of Colloidal Mesoporous Silica Nanoparticles with Different Diameters and Their Unique Degradation Behavior in Static Aqueous Systems
Abstract
The degradation of colloidal mesoporous silica nanoparticles (CMPS) is quite important for the design of stable catalyst supports and biodegradable drug delivery systems carriers. The degradation of various silica nanoparticles in static aqueous systems was investigated. The condition was achieved through the use of a dialysis tube. Four types of CMPS with different particle diameters (ca. 20–80 nm) were newly prepared from tetraalkoxysilanes (Si(OR) 4, R = Me, Et, Pr, and Bu) at different hydrolysis rates by a one-pot synthesis. Larger particles were formed by using tetraalkoxysilanes at slower hydrolysis rates because particle growth dominates nucleation. The degradation of CMPS is independent of diameter differences. The degradation rate of CMPS is higher than that of colloidal nonporous silica nanoparticles with smaller diameters because of the presence of mesopores. CMPS are also more degradable than aggregated CMPS because of colloidal dispersity. Moreover, it was confirmed for the first time that the degradation simultaneously proceeds from the outer as well as the inner surfaces of CMPS and that the mesostructure and morphology are partly retained even after more than half of the CMPS are degraded. The information on the degradation reported here is quite useful for the design of silica-based nanomaterials with tunable degradability/stability.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Biodegradable, Elastic Shape-Memory Polymers for Potential Biomedical Applications
Lendlein, A., & Langer, R. (2002) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.1066102 · Cited by 2,146
Cited by
Mesoporous materials and electrochemistry
Walcarius, A. (2013) · Chemical Society Reviews · doi:10.1039/c2cs35322a · Cited by 623
Mesoporous Silica Nanoparticles for Drug Delivery: Current Insights
Vallet-Regí, M., Colilla, M., Izquierdo-Barba, I., & Manzano, M. (2017) · Molecules · doi:10.3390/molecules23010047 · Cited by 538
Inorganic nanomaterials with rapid clearance for biomedical applications
Wang, X., Zhong, X., Li, J., Liu, Z., & Cheng, L. (2021) · Chemical Society Reviews · doi:10.1039/d0cs00461h · Cited by 509
Shiba, K., Tagaya, M., Tilley, R. D., & Hanagata, N. (2013) · Science and Technology of Advanced Materials · doi:10.1088/1468-6996/14/2/023002 · Cited by 309
Biosafety of mesoporous silica nanoparticles; towards clinical translation
Lérida-Viso, A., Estepa-Fernández, A., García-Fernández, A., Martí-Centelles, V., & Martínez-Máñez, R. (2023) · Advanced Drug Delivery Reviews · doi:10.1016/j.addr.2023.115049 · Cited by 279
Metadata
- Authors
- Yamada, H., Urata, C., Aoyama, Y., Osada, S., Yamauchi, Y., & Kuroda, K.
- Venue
- Chemistry of Materials
- Publisher
- American Chemical Society (ACS)
- Published
- 2012-04-06
- Volume
- 24
- Issue
- 8
- Pages
- 1462-1471
- ISSN
- 0897-4756 (ISSN-L)
- 1520-5002
- OpenAlex
- W2316044337
- Cited by
- 290
- References
- 1
- FWCI
- 8.40
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.