Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 306

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 4 of the 4 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Production of Molybdenum Trioxide Nanosheets by Liquid Exfoliation and Their Application in High-Performance Supercapacitors

Open access
Hanlon, Damien, Backes, Claudia, Higgins, Thomas M., Hughes, Marguerite, O’Neill, Arlene, King, Paul, McEvoy, Niall, Duesberg, Georg S., Mendoza Sanchez, Beatriz, Pettersson, Henrik, Nicolosi, Valeria, Coleman, Jonathan N.·2014·Chemistry of Materials

Abstract

Here, we demonstrate a simple method to exfoliate layered molybdenum trioxide (MoO 3 ) crystallites to give multilayer MoO 3 nanosheets dispersed in solvents. Exfoliation is achieved by sonicating MoO 3 powder in the presence of suitable solvents followed by centrifugation to remove undispersed material. This procedure works well in a range of solvents with Hildebrand solubility parameters close to 21 MPa 1/2 and is consistent with the predictions of classical solubility theory. We have fully optimized this process and demonstrated methods to separate the resultant nanosheets by size. Raman spectroscopy suggests the exfoliation process does not damage the MoO 3 . This is supported by measurements showing that the reaggregated nanosheets display very similar photoluminescence to bulk MoO 3 . However, the dispersed nanosheets had distinctly different photoluminescence, indicating a decoupling of the monolayers on exfoliation. We have used liquid-exfoliated MoO 3 to prepare supercapacitor electrodes that have relatively low capacitance (∼2 F/g at 10 mV/s) because of the low electrical conductivity of the MoO 3 . However, addition of carbon nanotubes beyond the percolation threshold yielded a 100-fold increase in capacitance. Some MoO 3 /nanotube composites displayed a capacitance as high as 540 F/g at 0.1 mV/s. This is the first example of solvent exfoliation of a layered metal oxide. We believe this work opens the way to liquid exfoliation of a wide range of layered compounds, leading to an array of new solution-processed 2D materials.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1021/cm500271u

Cites

4 of 4 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Cited by

See all 306

Metadata

Authors
Hanlon, D., Backes, C., Higgins, T. M., Hughes, M., O’Neill, A., King, P., McEvoy, N., Duesberg, G. S., Mendoza Sanchez, B., Pettersson, H., Nicolosi, V., & Coleman, J. N.
Venue
Chemistry of Materials
Published
2014-02-13
Volume
26
Issue
4
Pages
1751-1763
ISSN
  • 0897-4756 (ISSN-L)
  • 1520-5002
OpenAlex
W2040521734
Cited by
306
References
4
FWCI
13.47
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
green

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.