The DOI matches its Crossref record; 3 of the 3 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Ultralightweight and Flexible Silylated Nanocellulose Sponges for the Selective Removal of Oil from Water
Abstract
In this work, we report the facile synthesis of hydrophobic, flexible, and ultralightweight (ρ sponge ≤ 17.3 mg/cm 3 ) nanocellulose sponges using a novel and efficient silylation process in water. These functional materials with high porosity (≥99%) are easily engineered by freeze-drying water suspensions of nanofibrillated cellulose (NFC), a natural nanomaterial isolated from renewable resources, in the presence of methyltrimethoxysilane sols of various concentrations. Microscopic and solid state nuclear magnetic resonance analyses reveal that the sponges are composed of a three-dimensional cellulosic network of thin sheets and nanofilaments, covered by polysiloxanes. Compared with conventional inorganic porous materials, the silylated NFC sponges display an unprecedented flexibility with a maximal shape recovery corresponding to 96% of the original thickness after 50% compression strain. The sponges also combine both hydrophobic and oleophilic properties and prove to be very efficient in removing dodecane spills from a water surface with an excellent selectivity and recyclability. Finally, the sponges can collect a wide range of organic solvents and oils with absorption capacities up to 100 times their own weight, depending on the density of the liquids. This versatile functionalization method opens up new opportunities for the design of novel advanced functional biomaterials with controlled properties.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Pääkkö, M., Ankerfors, M., Kosonen, H., Nykänen, A., Ahola, S., Österberg, M., Ruokolainen, J., Laine, J., Larsson, P. T., Ikkala, O., et al. (2007) · Biomacromolecules · doi:10.1021/bm061215p · Cited by 1,962
On the mechanism of dissolution of cellulose
Lindman, B., Karlström, G., & Stigsson, L. (2010) · Journal of Molecular Liquids · doi:10.1016/j.molliq.2010.04.016 · Cited by 792
Bi, H., Yin, Z., Cao, X., Xie, X., Tan, C., Huang, X., Chen, B., Chen, F., Yang, Q., Bu, X., et al. (2013) · Advanced Materials · doi:10.1002/adma.201302435 · Cited by 667
Cited by
Bioinspired wood nanotechnology for functional materials
Berglund, L. A., & Burgert, I. (2018) · Advanced Materials · doi:10.1002/adma.201704285 · Cited by 518
Yang, X., & Cranston, E. D. (2014) · Chemistry of Materials · doi:10.1021/cm502873c · Cited by 473
Nanocellulose as a novel nanostructured adsorbent for environmental remediation: a review
Mahfoudhi, N., & Boufi, S. (2017) · Cellulose · doi:10.1007/s10570-017-1194-0 · Cited by 420
Carbon-based sustainable nanomaterials for water treatment: State-of-art and future perspectives
Nasrollahzadeh, M., Sajjadi, M., Iravani, S., & Varma, R. S. (2021) · Chemosphere · doi:10.1016/j.chemosphere.2020.128005 · Cited by 367
Recent Developments in Nanocellulose-Based Aerogels in Thermal Applications: A Review
Ahankari, S., Paliwal, P., Subhedar, A., & Kargarzadeh, H. (2021) · ACS Nano · doi:10.1021/acsnano.0c09678 · Cited by 281
Metadata
- Authors
- Zhang, Z., Sèbe, G., Rentsch, D., Zimmermann, T., & Tingaut, P.
- Venue
- Chemistry of Materials
- Publisher
- American Chemical Society (ACS)
- Published
- 2014-04-10
- Volume
- 26
- Issue
- 8
- Pages
- 2659-2668
- ISSN
- 0897-4756 (ISSN-L)
- 1520-5002
- OpenAlex
- W2329075919
- Cited by
- 613
- References
- 3
- FWCI
- 16.44
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.